Michael Teer v. Sabert Corporation et al
Plaintiff: MICHAEL TEER
Defendant: DOES 1 through 50, inclusive., Sabert Corporation and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive
Case Number: 5:2019cv02482
Filed: December 26, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Andre Birotte
Referring Judge: Sheri Pym
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 11, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 19, 2020 Filing 12 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Michael Teer, identifying Sabert Corporation. (Rothman, Jason)
February 19, 2020 Filing 11 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to County of Riverside #10 . The following error(s) was/were found: Local Rule 7.1-1 No Notice of Interested Parties and/or no copies. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (gk)
February 11, 2020 Filing 10 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to County of Riverside filed by Plaintiff Michael Teer. Motion set for hearing on 3/13/2020 at 10:00 AM before Judge Andre Birotte Jr. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum, #2 Declaration of Jason Rothman, #3 Exhibit A - Correspondence, #4 Proposed Order) (Rothman, Jason)
January 31, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 9 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) Order to Show Cause Regarding Dismissal for Lack of Prosecution by Judge Andre Birotte Jr.: The Court, on its own motion, orders plaintiff(s) to show cause in writing on or before 2/17/2020 why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. The Order to Show Cause will stand submitted upon the filing of plaintiff(s)/defendant(s) response. If plaintiff(s)/defendant(s) files: An answer by the following defendant(s): Sabert Corporation on or before the date indicated above, the Court will consider this a satisfactory response to the Order to Show Cause. Court Reporter: N/A. (gk)
January 6, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 8 STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. (pbl)
December 30, 2019 Filing 7 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT of Eastern Division Removal Case. This case was initially assigned to District Judge Jesus G. Bernal and referred to Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym for discovery. Pursuant to General Order 19-03, this case has been randomly reassigned to District Judge Andre Birotte Jr. The case number on all documents filed with the Court in this case should read as follows: 5:19-cv-02482 AB (SPx). (jtil)
December 30, 2019 Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil)
December 30, 2019 Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Andre Birotte Jr and Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym. (jtil)
December 26, 2019 CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT filed by Plaintiff Michael Teer of Riverside Superior Court on 11/25/2019, attached as Exhibit A. (jtil)
December 26, 2019 Filing 4 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Defendant Sabert Corporation, re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 , Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #3 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 served on 12/26/19. (Berhe, Kaleb)
December 26, 2019 Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Sabert Corporation, (Berhe, Kaleb)
December 26, 2019 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Sabert Corporation. (Berhe, Kaleb)
December 26, 2019 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Riverside Superior Court, case number RIC1905847 Receipt No: 0973-25019287 - Fee: $400, filed by Defendant Sabert Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Christopher G. Ward, #2 Exhibit A to Declaration of Christopher G. Ward) (Attorney Kaleb Nathaniel Berhe added to party Sabert Corporation(pty:dft))(Berhe, Kaleb)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Michael Teer v. Sabert Corporation et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DOES 1 through 50, inclusive.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sabert Corporation
Represented By: Kaleb Nathaniel Berhe
Represented By: Kristina Marie Fernandez Mabrie
Represented By: Christopher Gary Ward
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DOES 1 through 50, inclusive
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: MICHAEL TEER
Represented By: David Yeremian
Represented By: Jason W Rothman
Represented By: Emil Davtyan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?