Beverly Rosales v. Amazon Fulfillment Services et al
| Beverly Rosales |
| Amazon.com Services, Inc., Amazon Fulfillment Services, Does 2 through 100, Inclusive, Golden State FC, LLC and Doe |
| 5:2019mc00006 |
| March 25, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 26, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 NOTICE of New Case Number and Judge Assignment by Clerk. This case is hereby converted from case type MC to case type CV because the incorrect case type was used at case opening. A new case number has therefore been assigned to this case. District Judge Jesus G. Bernal and Magistrate Judge Shashi H. Kewalramani are assigned to this new case number. All future documents must be filed under the new case number, which is 5:19-cv-00537-JGB-SHKx. The previous case number, 5:19-mc-00006, is hereby terminated. (car) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Superior Court of California, case number RIC1900658 Receipt No: 0973-23435467 - Fee: $400, filed by Defendant Amazon.com Services, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-Complaint, #2 Exhibit B-Amendment to Complaint, #3 Exhibit C-Dismissal Form, #4 Exhibit D-SOS Washington Annual Report) (Attorney Douglas Evans Dexter added to party Amazon.com Services, Inc.(pty:dft))(Dexter, Douglas) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
