Steven Robert Chaney v. Ken Clark
| Steven Robert Chaney |
| Ken Clark |
| 5:2020cv00017 |
| January 3, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Jesus G Bernal |
| Sheri Pym |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 11, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF LODGING filed re Return to Habeas Petition (2254) #6 (Attachments: #1 Lod 1 CT VOL 1 of 1.pdf_Part1.pdf, #2 Lod 1 CT VOL 1 of 1.pdf_Part2.pdf, #3 Lod 2 RT VOL 1 of 3 (pgs 1-187).pdf.pdf, #4 Lod 2 RT VOL 2 of 3 (pgs 188-423).pdf.pdf, #5 Lod 2 RT VOL 3 of 3 (pgs 424-563).pdf.pdf, #6 Lod 3 AOB.pdf.pdf, #7 Lod 4 RB.pdf.pdf, #8 Lod 5 Appellant's Reply Brief.pdf.pdf, #9 Lod 6 E070218 Opinion -DCA Dec Aff Unpubl with directions.pdf.pdf, #10 Lod 7 Petition for Review (S255910).pdf.pdf, #11 Lod 8 Order Denying Pet for Review (S255910).pdf.pdf)(LaPietra, Vincent) |
| Filing 6 ANSWER to Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2254) #1 filed by Respondent Ken Clark. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum of Points and Authorities)(LaPietra, Vincent) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE of California Attorney General Office Vincent P. LaPietra on behalf of Respondent Ken Clark. (Attorney Vincent P LaPietra added to party Ken Clark(pty:res))(LaPietra, Vincent) |
Filing 4
ORDER REQUIRING ANSWER/RETURN TO PETITION by Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym (SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS). Notice: The court has issued a ruling on preliminary review. Pursuant to the Agreement on Acceptance of Service between the Clerk of Court and the California Attorney Generals Office, this Notice constitutes service under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4. (Attachments: #1 Petition, #2 Consent) (kca)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF REFERENCE to a U.S. Magistrate Judge. This case has been assigned to the calendar of the Honorable District Judge Jesus G. Bernal and referred to Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym, who is authorized to consider preliminary matters and conduct all further hearings as may be appropriate or necessary. Pursuant to Local Rule 83-2.4, the Court must be notified within five (5) days of any address change. See notice for additional details. (esa) |
| Filing 2 CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by petitioner Steven Robert Chaney. (esa) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person In State Custody (28:2254) Case assigned to Judge Jesus G. Bernal and referred to Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym,(Filing fee $ 5 paid), filed by petitioner Steven Robert Chaney. (esa) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Steven Robert Chaney v. Ken Clark | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Ken Clark | |
| Represented By: | Vincent P LaPietra |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Steven Robert Chaney | |
| Represented By: | Stephen D Klarich |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
