Kenneth Reckelhoff et al v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc. et al
| Kenneth Reckelhoff and Daina Reckelhoff |
| Experian Information Solutions, Inc., Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc., Equifax Information Services, LLC and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. |
| 5:2020cv00108 |
| January 15, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Sheri Pym |
| Otis D Wright |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. § 1681 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 10, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 31 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc., identifying SPS Holding Corp.; Credit Suisse (USA), Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(McGinnis, Shanon) |
| Filing 30 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. Answer to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #27 . The following error(s) was/were found: Local Rule 7.1-1 No Notice of Interested Parties and/or no copies. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (lc) |
Filing 29
ORDER that the Scheduling Conference is set for 6/15/2020 1:30 PM ; compliance with FRCP 16, and 26(f) and filing of joint report; Counsel for plaintiff shall immediately serve this Order on all parties, including any new parties to the action by Judge Otis D Wright, II (lc)
|
| Filing 28 NOTICE of Settlement (with Defendant Equifax Information Services, LLC) filed by Plaintiffs Daina Reckelhoff, Kenneth Reckelhoff. (Angelo, Joseph) |
| Filing 27 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendant Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(McGinnis, Shanon) |
|
Filing 26
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: Plaintiff(s) is ordered to show cause in writing no later than March 11, 2020 why this action shouldnot be dismissed for lack of prosecution. The Court will consider the filing of the following, as an appropriate response to this OSC, on or before the above date:Plaintiff's request for entry of default as to the defendant-Equifax Information Services, LLC. In the event both documents are filed before the above date, the answer will take precedence. Answer by the defendant(s). No oral argument. The Order will stand submitted upon the filing of the response to the Order to Show Cause. Failure to respond to the Court's Order may result in the dismissal of the action. (lc)
|
|
Filing 25
ORDER GRANTING SECOND STIPULATION TO EXTEND EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC.'S TIME TO RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT TO MARCH 23, 2020 #24 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II (lc)
|
| Filing 24 Second STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Experian Information Solutions, Inc. answer now due 3/23/2020, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendant Experian Information Solutions, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Sun, Jennifer) |
|
Filing 23
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT BY MORE THAN 30 DAYS) #22 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.s Response to the Complaint shall be due on or before March 20, 2020 (lc)
|
| Filing 22 STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Answer to 03/20/2020 re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Williams, Dawn) |
|
Filing 21
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: Plaintiffs and Defendant Select Portfolio Serving, Inc. by and through their respective counsel of record, having stipulated that SPS shall have until March 9, 2020 to respond to Plaintiffs Complaint, for good cause shown, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED #18 . (lc)
|
| Filing 20 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Proof of Service (subsequent documents) #19 . The following error(s) was/were found: Title page is missing. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (lc) |
| Filing 19 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by Defendant Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc., re Stipulation Extending Time to Answer (30 days or less) #18 (McGinnis, Shanon) |
| Filing 18 Second STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. answer now due 3/9/2020, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendant Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc..(McGinnis, Shanon) |
| Filing 16 NOTICE OF CLERICAL ERROR: Due to clerical error, the Minutes #15 had the incorrect minute order attached. (yl) |
|
Filing 17
MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: Plaintiffs and Defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (Chase) (collectively the Parties) by and through their respective counsel of record, having stipulated that Chase shall have until March 6, 2020 to respond to Plaintiffs Complaint, for good cause shown, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED. (yl)
|
|
Filing 15
**REFER TO NOTICE OF CLERICAL ERROR #16 ** MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: Plaintiffs and Defendant Equifax Information Services, LLC. (Equifax) (collectively the Parties) by and through their respective counsel of record, having stipulated that the County shall have until March 6, 2020 to respond to Plaintiffs Complaint, for good cause shown, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED. (yl) Modified on 2/7/2020 (yl).
|
| Filing 14 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Experian Information Solutions, Inc., identifying Experian plc, Central Source LLC, Online Data Exchange LLC, New Management Services LLC, VantageScore Solutions LLC, Opt-Out Services LLC. (Sun, Jennifer) |
| Filing 13 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Experian Information Solutions, Inc. answer now due 3/9/2020, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendant Experian Information Solutions, Inc..(Attorney Jennifer Sun added to party Experian Information Solutions, Inc.(pty:dft))(Sun, Jennifer) |
| Filing 12 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. answer now due 3/6/2020, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A..(Attorney Dawn Nicole Williams added to party JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.(pty:dft))(Williams, Dawn) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Thomas P Quinn, Jr on behalf of Defendant Equifax Information Services, LLC (Quinn, Thomas) |
| Filing 10 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Equifax Information Services, LLC answer now due 3/6/2020, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendant Equifax Information Services, LLC.(Attorney Thomas P Quinn, Jr added to party Equifax Information Services, LLC(pty:dft))(Quinn, Thomas) |
| Filing 9 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. answer now due 2/28/2020, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendant Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Attorney Shanon J McGinnis added to party Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc.(pty:dft))(McGinnis, Shanon) |
|
Filing 8
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Otis D Wright, II: This action has been assigned to the calendar of Judge Otis D. Wright II. Counsel are STRONGLY encouraged to review the Central Districts website for additional information. (SEE DOCUMENT FOR SPECIFIC FILING REQUIREMENTS AND INFORMATION. The parties may consent to proceed before a Magistrate Judge appearing on the voluntary consent list. PLEASE refer to Local Rule 79-5 for the submission of CIVIL ONLY SEALED DOCUMENTS. CRIMINAL SEALED DOCUMENTS will remain the same. all proposed sealed documents must be submitted via e-mail to the Judges Chambers email address, EXCLUDING those submitted by pro se parties and IN CAMERA filings, which shall continue to comply with Local Rule 79-5.1. Please refer to the Judges procedures and schedules for detailed instructions for submission of sealed documents. (lc)
|
| Filing 7 21 DAY Summons issued re Complaint #1 as to defendants Equifax Information Services, LLC, Experian Information Solutions, Inc., JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. (esa) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (esa) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Otis D. Wright, II and Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym. (esa) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiff Daina Reckelhoff, Kenneth Reckelhoff. (Angelo, Joseph) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Daina Reckelhoff, Kenneth Reckelhoff, (Angelo, Joseph) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiffs Daina Reckelhoff, Kenneth Reckelhoff. (Angelo, Joseph) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-25126018 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Kenneth Reckelhoff, Daina Reckelhoff. (Attorney Joseph Brian Angelo added to party Daina Reckelhoff(pty:pla), Attorney Joseph Brian Angelo added to party Kenneth Reckelhoff(pty:pla))(Angelo, Joseph) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
