Symbology Innovations LLC v. NovaTime Technology Inc. et al
Symbology Innovations LLC |
Ascentis Corporation and NovaTime Technology Inc. |
5:2020cv00145 |
January 20, 2020 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Philip S Gutierrez |
Gail J Standish |
Patent |
35 U.S.C. ยง 271 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 19, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 16 Second STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Answer to 4/19/2020 filed by Plaintiff Symbology Innovations LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Anderson, Kirk) |
Filing 15 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Symbology Innovations LLC, upon Defendant NovaTime Technology Inc. served on 2/7/2020, answer due 3/20/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon CT Corporation Registered Agent in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons returned. (Anderson, Kirk) |
Filing 14 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Symbology Innovations LLC, upon Defendant Ascentis Corporation served on 2/7/2020, answer due 3/20/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon CT Corporation Registered Agent in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons returned. (Anderson, Kirk) |
Filing 13 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Ascentis Corporation answer now due 3/20/2020; NovaTime Technology Inc. answer now due 3/20/2020, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendants Ascentis Corporation; NovaTime Technology Inc..(Attorney Erin Kathryn Overom Dungan added to party Ascentis Corporation(pty:dft), Attorney Erin Kathryn Overom Dungan added to party NovaTime Technology Inc. (pty:dft))(Dungan, Erin) |
Filing 12 STANDING ORDER REGARDING NEWLY ASSIGNED CASES by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. (ji) |
Filing 11 NOTICE AND ORDER REGARDING TRANSFER AND/OR REASSIGNMENT OF PATENT CASE by Judge Otis D. Wright, II. Case transferred from Magistrate Judge Kenly Kiya Kato and Judge Otis D. Wright, II to Judge Philip S. Gutierrez and Magistrate Judge Gail J. Standish for all further proceedings. Case number now reads 5:20-cv-00145 PSG (GJSx). (esa) |
Filing 10 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Ascentis Corporation. (car) |
Filing 9 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant NovaTime Technology Inc. (car) |
Filing 8 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car) |
Filing 7 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Otis D. Wright, II and Magistrate Judge Kenly Kiya Kato. (car) |
Filing 6 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Symbology Innovations LLC. (Anderson, Kirk) |
Filing 5 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Symbology Innovations LLC. (Anderson, Kirk) |
Filing 4 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Plaintiff Symbology Innovations LLC (Anderson, Kirk) |
Filing 3 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION regarding a copyright (Initial Notification) filed by Symbology Innovations LLC. (Anderson, Kirk) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Symbology Innovations LLC. (Anderson, Kirk) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-25153509 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Symbology Innovations LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit) (Attorney Kirk J Anderson added to party Symbology Innovations LLC(pty:pla))(Anderson, Kirk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.