Frank Soto v. Andonian Enterprises, Inc. et al
Frank Soto |
Does 1-10 and Andonian Enterprises, Inc. |
5:2020cv00260 |
February 9, 2020 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Jesus G Bernal |
Sheri Pym |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 2, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 ORDER by Judge Jesus G. Bernal: Granting #13 APPLICATION to Stay Case re Early Mediation ADA Disability Access Litigation as to Defendant Andonian Enterprises, Inc.( The ADR proceeding is to be completed no later than 7/1/2020.) Case Terminated (twdb). |
Filing 13 APPLICATION to Stay Case pending Mediation , First APPLICATION to Stay Case and Early Mediation re ADA Disability Access Litigation, filed by Defendant Andonian Enterprises, Inc.. (Chorbajian, Vatche) |
Filing 12 RESPONSE BY THE COURT TO NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES IN ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOCUMENTS RE: Deficiency in Electronically Filed Documents (G-112A) - optional html form,, #11 by Deputy Clerk of Court. The document is hereby stricken. Counsel is directed to file the proper form (ADR-21) which is available on the Court's website: http://www.cacd.uscourts.gov/court-procedures/forms. (iva) |
Filing 11 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: First APPLICATION to Stay pending Early Evaluation Conference #10 . The following error(s) was/were found: Incorrect document is attached to the docket entry. The Application for Stay and Early Mediation (ADR-21) is the proper form. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (ad) |
Filing 10 [DOCUMENT ORDERED STRICKEN PER DOCUMENT NO. 12] First APPLICATION to Stay pending Early Evaluation Conference filed by Defendant Andonian Enterprises, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Stay of Proceeding (DAL-010)) (Attorney Vatche Chorbajian added to party Andonian Enterprises, Inc.(pty:dft)) (Chorbajian, Vatche) Modified on 3/25/2020 (iva). |
Filing 9 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Frank Soto, upon Defendant Andonian Enterprises, Inc. served on 3/12/2020, answer due 4/2/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Agent for Service of Process: Andy Andonian in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by substituted service at business address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons returned. (Handy, Russell) |
Filing 8 STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Jesus G. Bernal. (ima) |
Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Andonian Enterprises, Inc. (lh) |
Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Jesus G. Bernal and Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym. (lh) |
Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Frank Soto. (Handy, Russell) |
Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by plaintiff Frank Soto, (Handy, Russell) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Frank Soto. (Handy, Russell) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-25287703 - Fee: $400, filed by plaintiff Frank Soto. (Attorney Russell C Handy added to party Frank Soto(pty:pla))(Handy, Russell) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.