Patricia Filardi v. Richard Zhang et al
| Patricia Filardi |
| KWANG JIN KIL and YOUNG JOONG KIL, Trustees under the KIL FAMILY REVOCABLE TRUST DATED DECEMBER 16, 2002, RICHARD ZHANG, an individual, doing business as Chaca Tea Bar, 1050 BALL RD., INC., a California corporation, Does 1-10, Inclusive,, DOES 1-10, inclusive, Richard Zhang, Kwang Jin Kil, 1050 Ball Rd, Inc., Young Joong Kil and Richard Zhang an individual doing business as Chaca Tea Bar |
| 5:2020cv00312 |
| February 18, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Percy Anderson |
| Shashi H Kewalramani |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 12101 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 20, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 19 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Kwang Jin Kil answer now due 4/22/2020; 1050 Ball Rd, Inc. answer now due 4/22/2020; Young Joong Kil answer now due 4/22/2020; Richard Zhang answer now due 4/22/2020, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendants Kwang Jin Kil; 1050 Ball Rd, Inc.; Young Joong Kil; Richard Zhang.(Attorney Hyunsuk A Chang added to party 1050 Ball Rd, Inc.(pty:dft), Attorney Hyunsuk A Chang added to party Kwang Jin Kil(pty:dft), Attorney Hyunsuk A Chang added to party Young Joong Kil(pty:dft), Attorney Hyunsuk A Chang added to party Richard Zhang(pty:dft))(Chang, Hyunsuk) |
| Filing 18 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Patricia Filardi, upon Defendant 1050 Ball Rd, Inc. served on 3/2/2020, answer due 3/23/2020. in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by substituted service at business address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons NOT returned. (Hashemi, Babak) |
| Filing 17 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Patricia Filardi, upon Defendant Young Joong Kil served on 3/2/2020, answer due 3/23/2020. in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by substituted service at business address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons NOT returned. (Hashemi, Babak) |
| Filing 16 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Patricia Filardi, upon Defendant Kwang Jin Kil served on 3/2/2020, answer due 3/23/2020. in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by substituted service at business address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons NOT returned. (Hashemi, Babak) |
| Filing 15 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Patricia Filardi, upon Defendant Richard Zhang served on 3/2/2020, answer due 3/23/2020. in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Hashemi, Babak) |
Filing 14
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS - COURT ORDER by Judge Percy Anderson. The Complaint filed in this action asserts a claim for injunctive relief arising out of an alleged violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act ("ADA") and one or more "construction-related accessibility claims" under California law, including a claim for damages pursuant to California's Unruh Act. Because the Court possesses only supplemental jurisdiction over the Unruh Act and any other state law claims, and in light of California's statutory efforts to curtail such claims, the Court ordered plaintiff to show cause in writing why the Court should exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the Unruh Act and any other state law claims asserted in the Complaint. See 28 U.S.C. 1367(c). The Court has reviewed the Response filed by plaintiff and plaintiff's counsel to the Court's Order to Show Cause. (SEE DOCUMENT FOR FULL DETAILS). For all of the foregoing reasons, the Court, in its discretion, declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over plaintiff's Unruh Act and any other construction-related accessibility claim. The Court therefore dismisses any such claims without prejudice. See 28 U.S.C. 1367(c)(4). (mrgo)
|
| Filing 13 RESPONSE filed by Plaintiff Patricia Filardito Order to Show Cause, #12 Re: Court's Exercise of Supplemental Jurisdiction (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Babak Hashemi, #2 Declaration of Plaintiff)(Hashemi, Babak) |
|
Filing 12
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Judge Percy Anderson. The Court orders plaintiff to show cause in writing why the Court should exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the Unruh Act claim and any other state law claim asserted in the Complaint. Plaintiff shall file a Response to this Order to Show Cause by no later than March 5,2020. (iv)
|
|
Filing 11
STANDING ORDER by Judge Percy Anderson. READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. IT CONTROLS THE CASE AND DIFFERS IN SOME RESPECTS FROM THE LOCAL RULES. This action has been assigned to the calendar of Judge Percy Anderson. (iv)
|
| Filing 10 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants 1050 Ball Rd, Inc., Kwang Jin Kil, Young Joong Kil, Richard Zhang. (Attachments: #1 Kil, #2 Zhang) (jtil) |
| Filing 9 Notice to Parties: ADA Disability Access Litigation. (tj) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Percy Anderson and Magistrate Judge Shashi H. Kewalramani. (jtil) |
| Filing 6 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Patricia Filardi. (Hashemi, Babak) |
| Filing 5 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Patricia Filardi. (Hashemi, Babak) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Patricia Filardi. (Hashemi, Babak) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Patricia Filardi, (Hashemi, Babak) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Patricia Filardi. (Hashemi, Babak) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-25367149 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Patricia Filardi. (Attorney Babak Hashemi added to party Patricia Filardi(pty:pla))(Hashemi, Babak) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
