Terri Gibson v. Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona, LLC et al
| Terri Gibson |
| Swift Transportation Services, LLC, Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona, LLC and Does 1 to 10, inclusive |
| 5:2020cv00318 |
| February 18, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Sheri Pym |
| Otis D Wright |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 05 U.S.C. § 704 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 17, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 25
ORDER/REFERRAL to ADR Procedure No 3 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II. Case ordered to a private mediator based upon a stipulation of the parties or by the court order. (lc)
|
|
Filing 24
SCHEDULING AND CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER (BENCH TRIAL) by Judge Otis D. Wright, II. This Order is to advise the parties and counsel of the schedule that will govern this case. THE SCHEDULING CONFERENCE IS VACATED. Schedule of Trial and Pretrial Dates: Bench Trial : 11/19/21 9:00 AM; Hearing on Motions in Limine: 11/8/21 1:30 PM; Final Pretrial Conference: 10/25/21 1:30 PM. SEE THE LAST PAGE OF THIS ORDER FOR THE SPECIFIED DATES. (lc)
|
|
Filing 23
JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial 3 days, filed by Plaintiff Terri Gibson.. (Rose, Adam)
|
|
Filing 22
ORDER that the Scheduling Conference is set for 9/21/ 2020 1:30 PM ; compliance with FRCP 16, and 26(f) and filing of joint report; Counsel for plaintiff shall immediately serve this Order on all parties, including any new parties to the action by Judge Otis D Wright, II (lc)
|
|
Filing 21
NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Answer to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #20 by Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona, LLC, Swift Transportation Services, LLC. The following error(s) was/were found: Local Rule 7.1-1 No Notice of Interested Parties and/or no copies. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (lc)
|
|
Filing 20
ANSWER to Amended Complaint/Petition #19 filed by Defendants Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona, LLC, Swift Transportation Services, LLC.(Young, Brett)
|
|
Filing 19
SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendants All Defendants amending Amended Complaint/Petition #15 , filed by plaintiff Terri Gibson(Rose, Adam)
|
|
Filing 18
ORDER ALLOWING PLAINTIFF TO FILE A SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT WITHIN 15 DAYS OF THIS ORDER #17 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II, (lc)
|
|
Filing 17
STIPULATION for Leave to file a second amended complaint filed by plaintiff Terri Gibson. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit second amended complaint, #2 Proposed Order)(Rose, Adam)
|
|
Filing 16
Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Brett David Young counsel for Defendants Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona, LLC, Swift Transportation Services, LLC. Adding Brett D. Young as counsel of record for Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona, LLC and Swift Transsportation Services, LLC for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendants Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona, LLC and Swift Transp;o;rtation Services, LLC. (Attorney Brett David Young added to party Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona, LLC(pty:dft), Attorney Brett David Young added to party Swift Transportation Services, LLC(pty:dft))(Young, Brett)
|
|
Filing 15
FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendants All Defendants amending Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 , filed by plaintiff Terri Gibson(Rose, Adam)
|
|
Filing 14
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: Plaintiff Terri Gibson and Defendants Swift Transportation Company of Arizona, LLC and Swift Transportation Services, LLC, by and through their respective counsel of record #13 , having stipulated that Defendants shall have until April 17, 2020 to respond to Plaintiffs Complaint, for good cause shown,IT IS HEREBY ORDERED. (lc)
|
|
Filing 13
STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Swift Transportation Services, LLC answer now due 4/17/2020; Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona, LLC answer now due 4/17/2020, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendants Swift Transportation Services, LLC; Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona, LLC.(Attorney Robert E Mussig, Jr added to party Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona, LLC(pty:dft), Attorney Robert E Mussig, Jr added to party Swift Transportation Services, LLC(pty:dft))(Mussig, Robert)
|
|
Filing 12
PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Terri Gibson, upon Defendant Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona, LLC served on 2/26/2020, answer due 3/18/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon,Jessie Gastelum, CT Corporation -Person Authorized to Accept Service of Process in compliance with statute not specified by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity.(lc)
|
|
Filing 11
PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Terri Gibson, upon Defendant Swift Transportation Services, LLC served on 2/26/2020, answer due 3/18/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Jessie Gastelum, CT Corporation -Person Authorized to Accept Service of Process in compliance with statute not specified by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity.(lc)
|
|
Filing 10
21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to defendants Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona, LLC, Swift Transportation Services, LLC., Does 1-10 (lc)
|
|
Filing 9
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Otis D Wright, II: This action has been assigned to the calendar of Judge Otis D. Wright II. Counsel are STRONGLY encouraged to review the Central Districts website for additional information. (SEE DOCUMENT FOR SPECIFIC FILING REQUIREMENTS AND INFORMATION. The parties may consent to proceed before a Magistrate Judge appearing on the voluntary consent list. PLEASE refer to Local Rule 79-5 for the submission of CIVIL ONLY SEALED DOCUMENTS. CRIMINAL SEALED DOCUMENTS will remain the same. all proposed sealed documents must be submitted via e-mail to the Judges Chambers email address, EXCLUDING those submitted by pro se parties and IN CAMERA filings, which shall continue to comply with Local Rule 79-5.1. Please refer to the Judges procedures and schedules for detailed instructions for submission of sealed documents. (lc)
|
|
Filing 8
Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Adam Morris Rose counsel for Plaintiff Terri Gibson. Adding Adam Rose as counsel of record for Terri Gibson for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by plaintiff Terri Gibson. (Rose, Adam)
|
|
Filing 7
Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Terri Gibson. (Rose, Adam)
|
|
Filing 6
NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap)
|
|
Filing 5
NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Otis D. Wright, II and Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym. (ghap)
|
|
Filing 4
NOTICE of Filing of Consent to Join Collective Action filed by Plaintiff Terri Gibson. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Opt-In Consent Form)(Tang, Theodore)
|
|
Filing 3
STATEMENT Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Terri Gibson (Tang, Theodore)
|
|
Filing 2
CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Terri Gibson. (Tang, Theodore)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-25381750 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Terri Gibson. (Attorney Theodore Richard Tang added to party Terri Gibson(pty:pla))(Tang, Theodore)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
