Louden, LLC v. Coretta Calloway et al
Plaintiff: Louden, LLC
Defendant: Does 1 to 10, inclusive and Coretta Calloway
Case Number: 5:2020cv00407
Filed: March 3, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Shashi H Kewalramani
Referring Judge: Josephine L Staton
Nature of Suit: Rent Lease & Ejectment
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 6, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 6, 2020 Filing 8 TRANSMITTAL of documents to Riverside County Superior Court. A certified copy of the order of remand and a copy of the docket sheet from this court was sent to Riverside County Superior Court. Case number: MVC1914234. (jp)
March 6, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER REMANDING CASE TO STATE COURT by Judge Josephine L. Staton that this matter be, and hereby is, REMANDED to the Superior Court of California for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. (Made JS-6 Case Terminated.) (jp)
March 6, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER RE REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Judge Josephine L. Staton that the request to Proceed In Forma Pauperis #3 is hereby DENIED. IT IS RECOMMENDED by Magistrate Judge Shashi H. Kewalramani for the following reasons: (1) District Court lacks jurisdiction. (2) Unlawful detainer. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case is hereby REMANDED to State Court. (jp)
February 28, 2020 Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (esa)
February 28, 2020 Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT of Eastern Division Removal Case. This case was initially assigned to District Judge Jesus G. Bernal and referred to Magistrate Judge Shashi H. Kewalramani for discovery. Pursuant to General Order 19-03, this case has been randomly reassigned to District Judge Josephine L. Staton. The case number on all documents filed with the Court in this case should read as follows: 5:20-cv-00407 JLS (SHKx). (esa)
February 28, 2020 Filing 3 REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, Declaration in Support filed by defendant Coretta Calloway. (esa)
February 28, 2020 Filing 2 CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE OF INTERESTED PARTIES filed by defendant Coretta Calloway. (esa)
February 28, 2020 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Superior Court of California Riverside County, case number MCV 1914234 WITHOUT copies of summons and complaint. Case assigned to Judge Josephine L. Staton, Discovery to Magistrate Judge Shashi H. Kewalramani, filed by defendant Coretta Calloway. (Attachments: #1 CV71) (esa)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Louden, LLC v. Coretta Calloway et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1 to 10, inclusive
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Coretta Calloway
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Louden, LLC
Represented By: Attorneys at Law
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?