Hailey Bonnet v. AXA Insurance Company
| Hayley Bonnet |
| Axa Insurance Company |
| 5:2020cv00511 |
| March 11, 2020 |
| U.S. District Court for the Central District of California |
| Kenly Kiya Kato |
| Fernando M Olguin |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 28, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 16
ORDER GRANTING THIRD STIPULATION #14 TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. Defendant shall have until May 27, 2020 to file an answer or otherwise response to Plaintiff's complaint. (iv)
|
| Filing 15 Certificate of Service filed by Defendant Axa Insurance Company re: Stipulation Extending Time to Answer (30 days or less), #14 (Heidtke, Daniel) |
| Filing 14 Third STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Axa Insurance Company answer now due 5/27/2020, re Order Extending Answer Due Deadline #13 filed by Defendant Axa Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Heidtke, Daniel) |
Filing 13
ORDER GRANTING SECOND STIPULATION #12 TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. Defendant shall have until April 27, 2020 to file an answer or otherwise response to Plaintiff's complaint. (et)
|
| Filing 12 Second STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Response as to Order Extending Answer Due Deadline #10 filed by Defendant Axa Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Certificate of Service)(Heidtke, Daniel) |
| Filing 11 TEXT ONLY ENTRY by Chambers of Judge Fernando M. Olguin. This matter has been assigned to District Judge Fernando M. Olguin. The Court refers counsel to the Court's Initial Standing Order found on the Court's Website under Judge Olguin's Procedures and Schedules. Please read this Order carefully. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (vdr) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
Filing 10
ORDER GRANTING FIRST STIPULATION #9 TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. Defendant shall have until March 28, 2020 to file an answer or otherwise response to Plaintiff's complaint. (iv)
|
| Filing 9 First STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Axa Insurance Company answer now due 3/25/2020, re Complaint - (Discovery) filed by Defendant Axa Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Heidtke, Daniel) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT of Eastern Division Removal Case. This case was initially assigned to District Judge Jesus G. Bernal and referred to Magistrate Judge Kenly Kiya Kato for discovery. Pursuant to General Order 19-03, this case has been randomly reassigned to District Judge Fernando M. Olguin. The case number on all documents filed with the Court in this case should read as follows: 5:20-cv-00511 FMO (KKx). (jtil) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE RE INTRA-DISTRICT TRANSFER by Clerk of Court due to incorrect intra- district venue selected by the filer. Case is transferred to the Eastern Division. Case has been assigned to Judge Fernando M. Olguin for all further proceedings. Any matters that may be referred to a Magistrate Judge are assigned to Kenly Kiya Kato. New Case Number 5:20-cv-00511 FMO (KKx). (jtil) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF SERVICE filed by Defendant AXA INSURANCE COMPANY, re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 served on March 11, 2020. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Certificate of Service)(Heidtke, Daniel) |
| CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT filed by Plaintiff Hayley Bonnet in Riverside Superior Court on 1/28/2020, attached as Exhibit A. (jtil) |
| Filing 4 RULE 7.1 DISCLOSURE of Interested Parties filed by DEFENDANT AXA INSURANCE COMPANY, identifying AIC is a direct subsidiary of AXA Delaware, LLC and an indirect subsidiary of XL Reinsurance America Inc., X.L. America, Inc., XL Financial Holdings (Ireland) Limited, XL Bermuda Ltd, EXEL Holdings Limited, XLIT Ltd., XL Group Ltd, and AXA SA.. (Heidtke, Daniel) |
| Filing 3 DECLARATION of NATASHA FEKULA re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendant AXA INSURANCE COMPANY. (Heidtke, Daniel) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant AXA INSURANCE COMPANY. (Heidtke, Daniel) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Superior Court County of Riverside, case number PSC2000752 Receipt No: ACACDC-25698671 - Fee: $400, filed by Defendant AXA INSURANCE COMPANY. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A) (Attorney Daniel B Heidtke added to party AXA INSURANCE COMPANY(pty:dft))(Heidtke, Daniel) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Hailey Bonnet v. AXA Insurance Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Hayley Bonnet | |
| Represented By: | William Schaffner Bennett |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Axa Insurance Company | |
| Represented By: | Max H Stern |
| Represented By: | Daniel B Heidtke |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.