Gina Rickard v. Riverside County Sheriffs Dept. et al
| Gina Rickard |
| Riverside County Sheriffs Dept, Michael Small, Riverside County Sheriffs Dept., Eric Khodadian, Randall White and Todd Shields |
| 5:2020cv00539 |
| March 13, 2020 |
| U.S. District Court for the Central District of California |
| Andre Birotte |
| Jacqueline Chooljian |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 19, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 JUDGMENT by Judge Andre Birotte Jr,. In accordance with the Memorandum Opinion and Order Dismissing Action, IT IS HEREBY ADJUDGED that this action is dismissed. #12 (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (es) |
Filing 12
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DISMISSING ACTION by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that this action is dismissed based upon plaintiff's failure to state a claim, her unreasonable failure to prosecute and her failure to comply with the April Order and the OSC. (es)
|
|
Filing 11
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Chooljian: IT IS ORDERED that the plaintiff shall show cause in writing, on or before May 29, 2020 why plaintiffs failure to file a first amended complaint, a notice of dismissal, or a notice of intent to stand on the Complaint should not be deemed plaintiff's admission that amendment is futile and why this action should not be dismissed on the grounds set forth in the April Order, on the ground that amendment is futile, based upon plaintiff's failure to prosecute, and/or based upon plaintiff's failure to comply with the April Order. (See document for details.) (es)
|
|
Filing 10
NOTICE OF DISCREPANCY AND ORDER: by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Chooljian, ORDERING 5 Email Communications dated April 15, 2020 submitted by Plaintiff Gina Rickard received on 4/15/20 is not to be filed but instead rejected. Denial based on: L.R. 83-2.5. Parties shall refrain from sending e-mail messages to judge; all matters must be called to judge's attention by appropriate application or motion filed in compliance with local rules. (es)
|
|
Filing 9
NOTICE OF DISCREPANCY AND ORDER: by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Chooljian, ORDERING 53 Email Communications dated April 9, 2020 submitted by Plaintiff Gina Rickard received on April 9, 2020 is not to be filed but instead rejected. Denial based on: Parties shall refrain from sending e-mail messages to judge; all matters must be called to Judge's attention by appropriate application or motion filed in compliance with local rules. (es)
|
|
Filing 8
(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER REGARDING AND DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO CEASE IMPROPER EMAIL COMMUNICATIONS by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Chooljian: Documents cannot be filed by sending them to the JCChambers Email Address. However, when a proposed order or other proposed document for the Courts signature is lodged or accompanies a proper filing, a WordPerfect or Word copy of the proposed order or other proposed document should be e-mailed to the JCChambers Email Address. See Local Rule 5-4.4.2. No other substantive communications should be sent to the JCChambers Email Address. (See documetn for details.) (es)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER DISMISSING COMPLAINT WITH LEAVE TO AMEND AND DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TORESPOND TO ORDER by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Chooljian. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Complaint is dismissed with leave to amend. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that within fourteen (14) days of the date of this Order, plaintiff must do one of the following: 1) File a First Amended Complaint which cures the pleading defects set forth herein; or 2) Sign and file the attached Notice of Dismissal which will result in the voluntary dismissal of this action without prejudice; or 3)File a Notice of Intent to Stand on Complaint, indicating plaintiff'sintent to stand on the original Complaint despite the defects set forth herein, which may result in the dismissal of this action in its entirety based upon such defects. (SEE DOUCMENT FOR FURTHER DETAILS) (Attachments: #1 Notice of Dismissal) (klg)
|
|
Filing 6
INITIAL ORDER RE: CIVIL RIGHTS CASES by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Chooljian. Until the Complaint has been screened and the Court has ordered that service of process may occur, plaintiff may not proceed with service of process upon defendants. (See document for details.) (sbou)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Chooljian: granting #3 REQUEST to Proceed in Forma Pauperis with Declaration in Support (CV-60). (sbou)
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Andre Birotte Jr and referred to Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Chooljian. (lh) |
| Filing 3 REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis with Declaration in Support filed by Plaintiff Gina Rickard. (lh) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Gina Rickard, (lh) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed against Defendants Eric Khodadian(Attorney for Todd Shields, official capacity), Eric Khodadian(Attorney for Todd Shields, individual capacity), Riverside County Sheriffs Dept., Todd Shields(President, individual capacity), Todd Shields(President, official capacity), Michael Small, Randall White(Judge, individual capacity), Randall White(Judge, official capacity) Case assigned to Judge Andre Birotte Jr and referred to Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Chooljian. Filed by Plaintiff Gina Rickard. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (lh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
