In Re Adrian T. Prewitt et al
De Vida USA, LLC, California Hospital Management and Collections, Inc., Beverly Hills Surgery Center, LLC, Cindy Omidi, Top Surgeons, LLC, Weightloss Centers, Michael Omidi, Surgery Center Management, LLC, Valencia Ambulartory Surgery, LLC, Julian Omidi, New Life Surgery Center, LLC and Modem Institute of Plastic Surgery, Inc. |
Adrian T. Prewitt and Gina T. Prewitt |
Lynda T. Bui and Herzog, Yuhas, Ehrlich and Ardell, APC |
5:2020cv00621 |
March 27, 2020 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
David O Carter |
Bankruptcy Appeal (801) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 0158 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 25, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 Opposition re: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Bankruptcy Appeal Appellee Lynda T. Bui, Chapter 7 Trustee's Notice Of Motion And Motion To Dismiss The Appeal; Memorandum Of Points And Authorities #11 filed by Appellants Beverly Hills Surgery Center, LLC, California Hospital Management and Collections, Inc., De Vida USA, LLC, Modem Institute of Plastic Surgery, Inc., New Life Surgery Center, LLC, Cindy Omidi, Julian Omidi, Michael Omidi, Surgery Center Management, LLC, Top Surgeons, LLC, Valencia Ambulartory Surgery, LLC, Weightloss Centers. (Welden, William) |
Filing 13 ORDER ON STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME IN WHICH TO RESPOND TO MOTION TO DISMISS (FRBP 8013(a)(3)(A)) by Judge David O. Carter, re Stipulation for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply, #12 : The Court, having reviewed the Parties' Stipulation To Extend Time For Appellants To Respond To Appellees Motion To Dismiss The Appeal (the "STIPULATION") and finding good cause, GRANTS the STIPULATION and authorizes Appellants to file their Opposition or Response to the Appellee's Motion to Dismiss the Appeal by no later than 11:59 p.m. on May 25, 2020. (bm) |
Filing 12 First STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Response to Motion to Dismiss as to NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Bankruptcy Appeal Appellee Lynda T. Bui, Chapter 7 Trustee's Notice Of Motion And Motion To Dismiss The Appeal; Memorandum Of Points And Authorities #11 filed by BK Appellant Top Surgeons, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Welden, William) |
Filing 11 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Bankruptcy Appeal Appellee Lynda T. Bui, Chapter 7 Trustee's Notice Of Motion And Motion To Dismiss The Appeal; Memorandum Of Points And Authorities filed by Appellee Lynda T. Bui, Chapter 7 Trustee Lynda T. Bui. Motion set for hearing on 6/15/2020 at 08:30 AM before Judge David O. Carter. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order [Proposed] Order Granting The Appellee's Motion to Dismiss The Appeal) (Steelman, Richard) |
Filing 10 APPEAL DEFICIENCY NOTICE, regarding Statement of Issues; Designation of Record; Notice of Transcript; Transcript forwarded to Judge David O. Carter. (twdb) |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Related Case(s) filed by Appellee Lynda T. Bui. Appellee Chapter 7 Trustee Lynda T. Bui's Notice Of Related Cases Of Three Appeals Before The Honorable David O. Carter Related Case(s): 5:19-cv-02302-DOC, 2:20-cv-01531-DOC (Steelman, Richard) |
Filing 8 Appellee Chapter 7 Trustee Lynda T. Bui's Certification Of Interested Parties CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Appellee Lynda T. Bui, identifying Adrian T. Prewitt, Gina T. Prewitt, Lynda T. Bui, solely in her capacity as Chapter 7 Trustee for the bankruptcy estate of Adrian T. Prewitt and Gina T. Prewitt. (Steelman, Richard) |
Filing 7 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Richard Poole Steelman, Jr counsel for Appellee Lynda T. Bui. Adding Richard P. Steelman, Jr. as counsel of record for Chapter 7 Trustee Lynda T. Bui (Appellee) for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Appellee Chapter 7 Trustee Lynda T. Bui. (Attorney Richard Poole Steelman, Jr added to party Lynda T. Bui(pty:e))(Steelman, Richard) |
Filing 6 ORDER RE TRANSFER PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 19-03-Related Case- filed. Related Case No: 5:19-cv-02302-DOC. Case transferred from Judge Josephine L. Staton to Judge David O. Carter for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 5:20-cv-00621-DOC. Signed by Judge David O. Carter. (eva) |
Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et) |
Filing 4 NOTICE REGARDING APPEAL FROM BANKRUPTCY COURT. The appeal has been assigned to Judge Josephine L. Staton. Refer to the Notice for specifics. (et) |
Filing 3 NOTICE OF TRANSFER OF APPEAL TO DISTRICT COURT FROM BAP CC-1065. (et) |
Filing 2 NOTICE OF REFERRAL OF APPEAL (ADVERSARY) prepared by the United States Bankruptcy Court on 3/19/2020. (et) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF APPEAL AND STATEMENT OF ELECTION: Re: Order Granting Chapter 7 Trustee's Application to Employ Herzog, Yuhas, Ehrlich and Ardell, APC a Special Litigation Counsel entered on 11/14/2019 by Bankruptcy Judge Scott H. Yun, filed in the Bankruptcy Court on 3/18/2020. Bankruptcy Court case number: 6:15-bk-15443 SY, Adversary number: NONE, BAP case number: CC-20-1065., filed by Appellants Valencia Ambulartory Surgery, LLC, New Life Surgery Center, LLC, Michael Omidi, De Vida USA, LLC, Surgery Center Management, LLC, Cindy Omidi, Beverly Hills Surgery Center, LLC, Weightloss Centers, Top Surgeons, LLC, California Hospital Management and Collections, Inc., Modem Institute of Plastic Surgery, Inc., Julian Omidi. (Attachments: #1 US BAP Docket) (et) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.