James Rutherford v. Freeman Property Ventures LLC, et al
| James Rutherford |
| DOES 1-10 Inclusive, FREEMAN PROPERTY VENTURES LLC, a Nevada limited liability company, Freeman Property Ventures LLC and Does 1-10, inclusive |
| 5:2020cv00638 |
| March 30, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Percy Anderson |
| Alka Sagar |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 12101 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 19, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 18 SCHEDULING MEETING OF COUNSEL [FRCP 16, 26(f)]; SCHEDULING CONFERENCE [FRCP 26(f)] by Judge Percy Anderson. Scheduling Conference set for June 29, 2020, at 10:30 am. (lom) |
| Filing 17 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Freeman Property Ventures LLC, (Mullhofer, Matthew) |
| Filing 16 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant Freeman Property Ventures LLC.(Attorney Matthew Charles Mullhofer added to party Freeman Property Ventures LLC(pty:dft))(Mullhofer, Matthew) |
| Filing 15 NOTICE OF ERRATA filed by Plaintiff James Rutherford. correcting REQUEST for Entry of Default against defendant Freeman Property Ventures LLC #14 (Manning, Joseph) |
| Filing 14 WITHDRAWN, see docket entry no. 15 - REQUEST for Entry of Default against defendant Freeman Property Ventures LLC filed by plaintiff James Rutherford. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Re: Entry of Default) (Manning, Joseph) Modified on 5/19/2020 (lom). |
| Filing 13 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff James Rutherford, upon Defendant Freeman Property Ventures LLC served on 4/28/2020, answer due 5/19/2020. in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Manning, Joseph) |
Filing 12
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS - COURT ORDER by Judge Percy Anderson. The Complaint filed in this action asserts a claim for injunctive relief arising out of an alleged violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act ("ADA") and one or more "construction-related accessibility claims" under California law, including a claim for damages pursuant to California's Unruh Act. Because the Court possesses only supplemental jurisdiction over the Unruh Act and any other state law claims, and in light of California's statutory efforts to curtail such claims, the Court ordered plaintiff to show cause in writing why the Court should exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the Unruh Act and any other state law claims asserted in the Complaint. See 28 U.S.C. 1367(c). The Court has reviewed the Response filed by plaintiff and plaintiff's counsel to the Court's Order to Show Cause. (SEE DOCUMENT FOR FULL DETAILS). For all of the foregoing reasons, the Court, in its discretion, declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over plaintiff's Unruh Act and any other construction-related accessibility claim. The Court therefore dismisses any such claims without prejudice. See 28 U.S.C. 1367(c)(4). (mrgo)
|
| Filing 11 RESPONSE filed by Plaintiff James Rutherfordto Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held,,,, Set/Reset Deadlines,,, #10 (Attachments: #1 Declaration of JRM, #2 Declaration of Plaintiff)(Manning, Joseph) |
|
Filing 10
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS - ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Judge Percy Anderson. The Complaint filed in this action asserts a claim for injunctive relief arising out of an alleged violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act ("ADA"), 42 U.S.C. 12010-12213, and a claim for damages pursuant to California's Unruh Civil Rights Act ("Unruh Act"), Cal. Civ. Code 51-53. It appears that the Court possesses only supplemental jurisdiction over the Unruh Act claim, and any other state law claim that plaintiff may have alleged, pursuant to the Court's supplemental jurisdiction. See 28 U.S.C. 1367(a). Plaintiff shall file a Response to this Order to Show Cause by no later than April 15, 2020. (mrgo)
|
|
Filing 9
STANDING ORDER by Judge Percy Anderson. READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. IT CONTROLS THE CASE AND DIFFERS IN SOME RESPECTS FROM THE LOCAL RULES. (See document for details) (mrgo)
|
| Filing 8 Notice to Parties: ADA Disability Access Litigation. (tj) |
| Filing 7 21 DAY Summons issued re Complaint #1 as to defendant Freeman Property Ventures LLC. (esa) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (esa) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Percy Anderson and Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar. (esa) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff James Rutherford. (Manning, Joseph) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff James Rutherford, (Manning, Joseph) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff James Rutherford. (Manning, Joseph) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-25907697 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff James Rutherford. (Attorney Joseph Richard Manning, Jr added to party James Rutherford(pty:pla))(Manning, Joseph) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
