Carol Torres v. Collection Consultants of California
| Carol Torres |
| Collection Consultants of California |
| 5:2020cv00730 |
| April 9, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Kenly Kiya Kato |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 18, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ORDER ON PLAINTIFF'S NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE #9 by Magistrate Judge Kenly Kiya Kato. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED by this Court that the above cause of action is hereby dismissed, with prejudice. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (hr)
|
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal filed by Plaintiff Carol Torres. Dismissal is with prejudice. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Wajda, Nicholas) |
| Filing 8 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Carol Torres, upon Defendant Collection Consultants of California served on 4/20/2020, answer due 5/11/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Sylvia Romero, Employee for Defendant in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons returned. (Wajda, Nicholas) |
| Filing 7 REMINDER NOTICE re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. Each party must file form CV-11C within the consent deadlines pursuant to L.R. 73-2. Additionally, the parties are directed to L.R. 73-2.2 Proof of Service. In any case in which only a magistrate judge is initially assigned, plaintiff must file a proof of service within 10 days of service of the summons and complaint as to each defendant. (dts) |
| Filing 6 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to Defendant Collection Consultants of California. (lh) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO COUNSEL re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. This case has been randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge Kenly Kiya Kato. (Attachments: #1 CV-11C) (lh) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiff Carol Torres. (Wajda, Nicholas) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Carol Torres, (Wajda, Nicholas) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Carol Torres. (Wajda, Nicholas) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with filing fee previously paid ($400.00 paid on 04/09/2020, receipt number ACACDC-26031397), filed by Plaintiff Carol Torres. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Bankruptcy Petition Excerpt, #2 Exhibit B - Collection Letter) (Attorney Nicholas M Wajda added to party Carol Torres(pty:pla))(Wajda, Nicholas) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Carol Torres v. Collection Consultants of California | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Collection Consultants of California | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Carol Torres | |
| Represented By: | Nicholas M Wajda |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
