Wendy Lopez v. Corelsun LLC et al
Wendy Lopez |
Corelsun LLC and Does 1-10 |
5:2020cv00746 |
April 10, 2020 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Jesus G Bernal |
Sheri Pym |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 24, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal filed by plaintiff Wendy Lopez. Dismissal is without prejudice. (Nakano, Jarrod) |
Filing 8 STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Jesus G. Bernal. (ima) |
Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Corelsun LLC. (car) |
Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Jesus G. Bernal and Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym. (car) |
Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #3 , Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 filed by plaintiff Wendy Lopez. (Nakano, Jarrod) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Wendy Lopez, (Nakano, Jarrod) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Movant Wendy Lopez. (Nakano, Jarrod) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-26050142 - Fee: $400, filed by plaintiff Wendy Lopez. (Attorney Jarrod Yutaka Nakano added to party Wendy Lopez(pty:bkmov))(Nakano, Jarrod) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.