State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. United States of America et al
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company |
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and Does I through V, inclusive |
5:2020cv00839 |
April 20, 2020 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Michael W Fitzgerald |
Sheri Pym |
Motor Vehicle |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1346 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 22, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant United States of America. (lh) |
Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald and Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym. (lh) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, identifying United States of America. (Benson, Susan) |
Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company. (Benson, Susan) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company. (Benson, Susan) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-26147542 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company. (Attorney Susan M Benson added to party State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company(pty:pla))(Benson, Susan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.