Luis A. Preciado v. M. E. Spearman
Luis Arturo Preciado |
M. E. Spearman |
5:2020cv00908 |
April 28, 2020 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Paul L Abrams |
Dale S Fischer |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 26, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
![]() |
Filing 9 FINANCIAL ENTRY: Received $5.00 from Luis Arturo Preciado. Re: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2254) #1 . Receipt number LA207750. (fr) |
Filing 8 RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE filed by Petitioner Luis Arturo Preciado to Order to Show Cause #3 (ch) |
Filing 7 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Magistrate Judge Paul L. Abrams. The Court is in receipt of petitioner's Motion requesting an extension of time to respond to the Court's April 29, 2020, Order to Show Cause. Petitioner's Motion is GRANTED IN PART. Petitioner's response to the Court's Order to Show Cause is now due NO LATER THAN JUNE 25, 2020. #6 (ch) |
Filing 6 Motion Requesting an Extension of Time in Which to Respond to the Court Order to Show Cause filed by petitioner Luis Arturo Preciado. (ch) |
Filing 5 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Magistrate Judge Paul L. Abrams. The Court is in receipt of petitioner's letter dated April 15, 2020, and received by the Court on April 27, 2020, in which petitioner advises the Court that he enclosed a $5.00 check to cover the filing fee. Petitioner is advised that the envelope did not contain a $5.00 check, nevertheless, the Clerk of the Court is ordered to waive the filing fee in this matter. The Clerk is instructed to send petitioner a copy of his Petition (ECF No. 1), and the Court's Order to Show Cause Re: Dismissal of Habeas Petition (ECF No. 3), along with this Order. #4 (Attachments: #1 Petition, #2 Order to Show Cause) (ch) |
![]() |
Filing 2 NOTICE OF REFERENCE to a U.S. Magistrate Judge. This case has been assigned to the calendar of the Honorable District Judge Dale S. Fischer and referred to Magistrate Judge Paul L. Abrams, who is authorized to consider preliminary matters and conduct all further hearings as may be appropriate or necessary. Pursuant to Local Rule 83-2.4, the Court must be notified within five (5) days of any address change. See notice for additional details. (Attachments: #1 CV 111) (esa) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person In State Custody (28:2254) Case assigned to Judge Dale S. Fischer and referred to Magistrate Judge Paul L. Abrams,(Filing fee $ 5 due), filed by petitioner Luis Arturo Preciado. (esa) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Luis A. Preciado v. M. E. Spearman | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: M. E. Spearman | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Luis Arturo Preciado | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.