Cathy Sypherd et al v. Lazy Dog Restaurants, LLC
| Cathy Sypherd, Patricia Brummett and Kimberly Watt |
| Lazy Dog Restaurants, LLC and Does 1-50 |
| 5:2020cv00921 |
| April 29, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Jesus G Bernal |
| Kenly Kiya Kato |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 10, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
SCHEDULING NOTICE AND ORDER by Judge Jesus G. Bernal. On June 15, 2020, Plaintiffs filed a First Amended Complaint (Doc. No. 13). Accordingly, Defendants Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 10) is hereby denied as moot. The hearing on this motion scheduled for July 6, 2020 is hereby vacated. IT IS SO ORDERED. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (iva) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
|
|
Filing 13
FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendant, Lazy Dog Restaurants, LLC; and Does 1-50 All Defendants amending Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 , filed by Plaintiffs Cathy Sypherd, Kimberly Watt, Patricia Brummett (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Hogue, Jeffrey)
|
|
Filing 12
NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Lazy Dog Restaurants, LLC, identifying Defendant LAZY DOG RESTAURANTS, LLC; Defendants parent company, LDR Holdings, LLC; Plaintiff CATHY SYPHERD; Plaintiff PATRICIA BRUMMETT; and Plaintiff KIMBELRY WATT. (Farber, Mia)
|
|
Filing 11
CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendant Lazy Dog Restaurants, LLC identifying LDR Holdings, LLC as Corporate Parent. (Farber, Mia)
|
|
Filing 10
NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss the complaint, or alternatively strike the class period and jury demand filed by Defendant Lazy Dog Restaurants, LLC. Motion set for hearing on 7/6/2020 at 09:00 AM before Judge Jesus G. Bernal. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Attorney Mia D Farber added to party Lazy Dog Restaurants, LLC(pty:dft)) (Farber, Mia)
|
|
Filing 9
STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Jesus G. Bernal. (ima)
|
|
Filing 8
SERVICE UNDER FRCP 5(b)(2)(D) Executed by Plaintiff Cathy Sypherd, upon Defendant Lazy Dog Restaurants, LLC served on 5/4/2020, answer due 5/26/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the Clerks Office in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Hogue, Jeffrey)
|
|
Filing 7
21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Lazy Dog Restaurants, LLC. (et)
|
|
Filing 6
NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et)
|
|
Filing 5
NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Jesus G. Bernal and Magistrate Judge Kenly Kiya Kato. (et)
|
|
Filing 4
Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #3 , Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 , Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #2 filed by Plaintiff Cathy Sypherd. (Hogue, Jeffrey)
|
|
Filing 3
CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Patricia Brummett. (Hogue, Jeffrey)
|
|
Filing 2
Certification and NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff All Plaintiffs, (Attorney Jeffrey L Hogue added to party Cathy Sypherd(pty:pla), Attorney Jeffrey L Hogue added to party Kimberly Watt(pty:pla))(Hogue, Jeffrey)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-26274784 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Patricia Brummett. (Attorney Jeffrey L Hogue added to party Patricia Brummett(pty:pla))(Hogue, Jeffrey)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
