Drew Allen Martin v. Cois Byrd Detention Center et al
| Drew Allen Martin |
| Dr. Sawires, Cois Byrd Detention Center and County of Riverside |
| 5:2020cv00976 |
| May 6, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Philip S Gutierrez |
| Douglas F McCormick |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 29, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against defendant(s) Cois Byrd Detention Center, Sawires (official capacity), Sawires(individual ), Cois Byrd Detention Center, County of Riverside, County of Riverside amending Complaint (Prisoner Civil Rights) #1 , filed by plaintiff Drew Allen Martin(es) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ELECTION FORM filed by Plaintiff Drew Allen Martin. (es) |
Filing 4
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick Dismissing Complaint with Leave to Amend. (Attachments: #1 Blank Notice of Election) (nbo)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Philip S. Gutierrez and referred to Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick. (car) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF FILING OF COMPLAINT WITHOUT PREPAYMENT OF FILING FEES OR REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS (CV-93) (car) |
| Filing 1 CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT filed against Defendants pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983. Case assigned to Judge Philip S. Gutierrez and referred to Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick, filed by Plaintiff Drew Allen Martin. (car) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
