Anita Mendoza v. The Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company
| Anita Mendoza |
| The Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company and Does 1-10 |
| 5:2020cv00993 |
| May 8, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Jesus G Bernal |
| Kenly Kiya Kato |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 8, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Related Case(s) filed by defendant The Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Sarah Ross, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D)(Ross, Sarah) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by defendant The Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company, (Ross, Sarah) |
| Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendant The Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company (Ross, Sarah) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant The Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company. (Ross, Sarah) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from San Bernardino Superior Court, case number CIVDS2004326 Receipt No: ACACDC-26384248 - Fee: $400, filed by Defendant The Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Sarah Ross, #2 Exhibit A to Ross Dec - Complaint, #3 Exhibit B to Ross Dec - Documents Served, #4 Declaration Linda H. Harrold) (Attorney Sarah Elana Ross added to party The Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company(pty:dft))(Ross, Sarah) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
