Edward Lu v. County of Riverside et al
| Edward Lu |
| County of Riverside, Saun Jackson, Does 1 through 10, inclusive and Does 1 through 10, |
| 5:2020cv01062 |
| May 20, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Shashi H Kewalramani |
| Consuelo B Marshall |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 5, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Saun Jackson answer now due 8/6/2020; County of Riverside answer now due 8/6/2020, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by defendants Saun Jackson; County of Riverside.(Attorney Allen Christiansen added to party County of Riverside(pty:dft), Attorney Allen Christiansen added to party Saun Jackson(pty:dft))(Christiansen, Allen) |
| Filing 10 SERVICE UNDER FRCP 5(b)(2)(D) Executed by Plaintiff Edward Lu, upon Defendant Saun Jackson served on 6/3/2020, answer due 7/6/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the Clerks Office in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Yu, Tom) |
| Filing 9 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed Edward Lu, upon Defendant County of Riverside served on 6/3/2020, answer due 7/6/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were NOT executed upon the United States Attorneys Office which was NOT served. The Attorney Generals Office of the United States was NOT served. The officer agency or corporation was NOT served. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt NOT attached. Original Summons returned. (Yu, Tom) |
Filing 8
STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Consuelo B. Marshall. READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. It controls this case and may differ in some respects from the Local Rules. (ys)
|
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Edward Lu, (Yu, Tom) |
| Filing 6 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Edward Lu. (Yu, Tom) |
| Filing 5 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants County of Riverside, Saun Jackson. (jtil) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening. The following error(s) was found: The Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71)is missing or incomplete. All civil actions presented for filing must be accompanied by a completed Civil Cover Sheet. See Local Rule 3-1. Counsel must file a completed Civil Cover Sheet immediately. Failure to do so may be addressed by judicial action, including sanctions. See Local Rule 83-7. No Notice of Interested Parties has been filed. A Notice of Interested Parties must be filed with every partys first appearance. See Local Rule 7.1-1. Counsel must file a Notice of Interested Parties immediately. Failure to do so may be addressed by judicial action, including sanctions. See Local Rule 83-7. (jtil) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Consuelo B. Marshall and Magistrate Judge Shashi H. Kewalramani. (jtil) |
| Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Edward Lu. (Yu, Tom) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-26508891 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Edward Lu. (Attorney Tom Yu added to party Edward Lu(pty:pla))(Yu, Tom) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
