Constance Wallenbrock et al v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
Plaintiff: Constance Wallenbrock
Defendant: United Parcel Service, Inc. (Ohio) and United Parcel Service, Inc.
Consolidated Plaintiff: Attorney John F. Litwin
Case Number: 5:2020cv01089
Filed: May 28, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Sheri Pym
Referring Judge: John F Walter
Nature of Suit: Labor: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 24, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 24, 2020 Filing 17 DECLARATION of Shiva Davoudian re Answer to Complaint #15 , Corporate Disclosure Statement #16 Lead Counsel filed by Defendant United Parcel Service, Inc.. (Bernstein, Alexandra)
July 24, 2020 Filing 16 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendant United Parcel Service, Inc. (Bernstein, Alexandra)
July 24, 2020 Filing 15 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant United Parcel Service, Inc..(Bernstein, Alexandra)
June 12, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT BY NOT MORE THAN 30 DAYS #13 by Judge John F. Walter. Defendant UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC. shall have up to and including July 24, 2020 to file a response to Plaintiff Constance Wallenbrook's Complaint. (iv)
June 11, 2020 Filing 13 Joint STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to filed by Defendant United Parcel Service, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Attorney Alexandra Victoria Bernstein added to party United Parcel Service, Inc.(pty:dft))(Bernstein, Alexandra)
June 8, 2020 Filing 12 SERVICE UNDER FRCP 5(b)(2)(D) Executed by Plaintiff Constance Wallenbrock, upon Defendant United Parcel Service, Inc. served on 6/3/2020, answer due 6/24/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the Clerks Office in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Wong, Gregory)
June 1, 2020 Filing 11 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant United Parcel Service, Inc. (iv)
June 1, 2020 Filing 10 DECLARATION of John F. Litwin Lead Trial Counsel filed by Plaintiff Constance Wallenbrock. (Wong, Gregory)
June 1, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 9 STANDING ORDER by Judge John F. Walter. READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. IT CONTROLS THE CASE AND DIFFERS IN SOME RESPECTS FROM THE LOCAL RULES. This action has been assigned to the calendar of Judge John F. Walter. [See document for details.] (et)
May 29, 2020 Filing 8 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Constance Wallenbrock. (Wong, Gregory)
May 29, 2020 Filing 7 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Request to Issue Summons RE: Summons Request #3 . The following error(s) was found: The caption of the summons must match the caption of the complaint verbatim. If the caption is too large to fit in the space provided, enter the name of the first party and then write see attached.Next, attach a face page of the complaint or a second page addendum to the Summons. The summons cannot be issued until this defect has been corrected. Please correct the defect and re-file your request. (lh)
May 29, 2020 Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh)
May 29, 2020 Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge John F. Walter and Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym. (lh)
May 28, 2020 Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Constance Wallenbrock, (Wong, Gregory)
May 28, 2020 Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Constance Wallenbrock. (Wong, Gregory)
May 28, 2020 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Constance Wallenbrock. (Wong, Gregory)
May 28, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-26598739 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Constance Wallenbrock. (Attorney Gregory P Wong added to party Constance Wallenbrock(pty:pla))(Wong, Gregory)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Constance Wallenbrock et al v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Constance Wallenbrock
Represented By: Gregory P Wong
Represented By: John F Litwin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United Parcel Service, Inc. (Ohio)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United Parcel Service, Inc.
Represented By: Alexandra Victoria Bernstein
Represented By: Shiva Shirazi Davoudian
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Consolidated plaintiff: Attorney John F. Litwin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?