Billy Basaldua v. George Jaime
| Billy Basaldua |
| George Jaime |
| 5:2020cv01156 |
| June 5, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Karen E Scott |
| Stephen V Wilson |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 4, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 RESPONSE filed by Petitioner Billy Basaldua to Order to Show Cause #6 . (et) |
Filing 6
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY PETITION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED AS UNTIMELY by Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott. Even assuming that Petitioner constructively filed the Petition on the date he signed it, i.e., May 24, 2020, that was long after the December 2018 expiration of his AEDPA filing deadline. The Petition therefore appears untimely. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, on or before August 3, 2020, Petitioner is ordered to show cause why the Petition should not be dismissed as untimely. (es)
|
| Filing 5 RESPONSE to Order to Show Cause, #4 filed by Petitioner Billy Basaldua (es) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY PETITION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO STATE A FEDERAL CLAIM by Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, on or before July 10, 2020, Petitioner is ordered to show cause why the Petition should not be dismissed for failure to state a federal claim for relief and/or failure to state a federal claim that is not barred by Tollett. Alternatively, Petitioner may voluntarily dismiss this action to pursue further relief from the state courts concerning his claims of sentencing error under state law. *See order for details.* (es)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF REFERENCE to a U.S. Magistrate Judge. This case has been assigned to the calendar of the Honorable District Judge Stephen V. Wilson and referred to Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott, who is authorized to consider preliminary matters and conduct all further hearings as may be appropriate or necessary. Pursuant to Local Rule 83-2.4, the Court must be notified within five (5) days of any address change. See notice for additional details. (car) |
| Filing 2 ELECTION REGARDING CONSENT TO PROCEED before a United States Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by Petitioner Billy Basaldua. (car) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person In State Custody (28:2254) Case assigned to Judge Stephen V. Wilson and referred to Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott.(Filing fee $ 5. FEE PAID), filed by Petitioner Billy Basaldua. (car) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Billy Basaldua v. George Jaime | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Billy Basaldua | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: George Jaime | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
