Hilda T. Harton v. Commissioner of Social Security
Hilda T. Harton |
Commissioner of Social Security |
5:2020cv01246 |
June 19, 2020 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Jean P Rosenbluth |
Stephen V Wilson |
Social Security: SSID Tit. XIV |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 15, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by Defendant Commissioner of Social Security. (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service)(Attorney Patrick W Snyder added to party Commissioner of Social Security(pty:dft))(Snyder, Patrick) |
Filing 8 NOTICE OF NO CONFLICT OF INTEREST filed by plaintiff Hilda T. Harton. (es) |
Filing 7 CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER by Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth. NOTE: BECAUSE PLAINTIFF IS PROCEEDING IN PRO PER, THIS CASE IS NOT SUBJECT TO ELECTRONIC FILING PROCEDURES. FURTHER, THIS ORDER DIFFERS IN VARIOUS RESPECTS FROM THE COURTS USUAL SOCIAL SECURITY CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER. (See Order for further details) (vm) |
Filing 6 MINUTE (IN CHAMBERS) Order re Possible Conflicts of Interest by Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth. The Court has a conflict of interest in hearing any matter in which Social Security Administration ALJ Robin Rosenbluth, who sits in West Los Angeles, has participated or presided. No later than seven days from the date of this order, Plaintiff must file notice that ALJ Rosenbluth did or did not participate in or preside over Plaintiffs case. (See Minute Order for further details) (vm) |
Filing 5 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Social Security), #1 as to Defendant Commissioner of Social Security. (es) |
Filing 4 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth: GRANTING #2 REQUEST to Proceed in Forma Pauperis with Declaration in Support (CV-60). (es) |
Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Stephen V. Wilson and referred to Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth. (car) |
Filing 2 REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis with Declaration in Support filed by Plaintiff Hilda T. Harton. (car) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed against Defendant Commissioner of Social Security. Case assigned to Judge Stephen V. Wilson and referred to Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth, filed by Plaintiff Hilda T. Harton. (car) (Additional attachment(s) added on 6/22/2020: #1 Proposed Summons) (car). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Hilda T. Harton v. Commissioner of Social Security | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Hilda T. Harton | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security | |
Represented By: | Assistant US Attorney LA-SSA |
Represented By: | Assistant US Attorney LA-CV |
Represented By: | Patrick W Snyder |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.