Misael Romero v. Tao Shing Hsu et al
| Misael Romero |
| Does 1-10, inclusive, Chen Ling Palace, Iris Hsu and Tao Shing Hsu |
| 5:2020cv01272 |
| June 25, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Shashi H Kewalramani |
| R Gary Klausner |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1331 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 14, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 23 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal filed by plaintiff Misael Romero. Dismissal is with prejudice. (Cornell, Ross) |
Filing 22
(IN CHAMBERS) Order re Notice of Settlement (DE #21 ) by Judge R. Gary Klausner: The parties are hereby notified that they are not relieved of any deadlines (including the filing of responsive documents, scheduled mediation, etc.) or Court appearances until a dismissal of the action is filed. A Notice of Dismissal or Application for Entry of Default must be filed no later than 8/14/2020. Failure to do so will result in immediate dismissal of the action for lack of prosecution. (jp)
|
| Filing 21 NOTICE of Settlement filed by plaintiff Misael Romero. (Cornell, Ross) |
|
Filing 20
(In Chambers) Order to Show Cause re Dismissal for Lack of Prosecution by Judge R. Gary Klausner: the court, on its own motion, orders plaintiff(s) to show cause in writing on or before 8/10/2020 why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. (See Civil Minutes for Further Specifics). (et)
|
| Filing 19 NOTICE OF DISMISSAL filed by plaintiff Misael Romero pursuant to FRCP 41a(1) without prejudice as to Iris Hsu. (Cornell, Ross) |
|
Filing 18
ORDER TO STRIKE ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOCUMENT(S) by Judge R. Gary Klausner: the following document(s) be STRICKEN for failure to comply with the Local Rules, General Order and/or the Courts Case Management Order: APPLICATION to Stay Case and Early Mediation re ADA Disability Access Litigation #14 , for the following reasons: The docket text indicates the application was filed on behalf of defendant Chen Ling Palace, however, the form indicates that defendant Tao Shing Hsu is requesting a stay of proceedings. (jp)
|
| Filing 17 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Misael Romero, upon Defendant Tao Shing Hsu served on 7/1/2020, answer due 7/22/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Tao Shing Hsu by Louise Hsu in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by substituted service at home address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons NOT returned. (Cornell, Ross) |
|
Filing 16
(In Chambers) Order to Show Cause re Dismissal for Lack of Prosecution by Judge R. Gary Klausner: The court, on its own motion, orders plaintiff(s) to show cause in writing on or before 7/30/2020 why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. (See Civil Minutes for Further Specifics). (jp)
|
| Filing 15 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by defendant Chen Ling Palace, re APPLICATION to Stay Case and Early Mediation re ADA Disability Access Litigation, #14 served on July 20, 2020. (Chen, Jacques) |
| Filing 14 [DOCUMENT STRICKEN PER ORDER DATED ON 7/30/2020, SEE DOCKET ENTRY NO. #18 ] - APPLICATION to Stay Case and Early Mediation re ADA Disability Access Litigation, filed by defendant Chen Ling Palace. (Attorney Jacques Clayton Chen added to party Chen Ling Palace(pty:dft)) (Chen, Jacques). Modified on 7/30/2020 (jp). |
| Filing 13 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Misael Romero, upon Defendant Iris Hsu served on 6/29/2020, answer due 7/20/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Iris Hsu by Louis Hsu, incharge in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by substituted service at business address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons NOT returned. (Cornell, Ross) |
| Filing 12 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Misael Romero, upon Defendant Chen Ling Palace served on 6/29/2020, answer due 7/20/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Chen Ling Palace by Louise Hsu, incharge in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by substituted service at business address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons NOT returned. (Cornell, Ross) |
| Filing 11 21 DAYS Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Chen Ling Palace, Iris Hsu, Tao Shing Hsu. (jp) |
| Filing 10 WITHDRAWAL of, Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 , filed by Plaintiff Misael Romero. (Cornell, Ross) |
|
Filing 9
(IN CHAMBERS) Order to Show Cause by Judge R. Gary Klausner: Plaintiff shall file a Response to this Order to Show Cause by no later than 7/6/2020. (See Civil Minutes for Further Specifics). (jp)
|
| Filing 8 Notice to Parties: ADA Disability Access Litigation. (sw) |
|
Filing 7
STANDING ORDER REGARDING NEWLY ASSIGNED CASES by Judge R. Gary Klausner. (sw)
|
| Filing 6 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Misael Romero. (Cornell, Ross) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (esa) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge R. Gary Klausner and Magistrate Judge Shashi H. Kewalramani. (esa) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Misael Romero, (Cornell, Ross) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Misael Romero. (Cornell, Ross) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-26951646 - Fee: $400, filed by plaintiff Misael Romero. (Attorney Ross Cornell added to party Misael Romero(pty:pla))(Cornell, Ross) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
