Anthony Wesley Sherman v. Andrew M. Saul
| Anthony Wesley Sherman |
| Andrew M Saul |
| 5:2020cv01344 |
| July 2, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Jean P Rosenbluth |
| Stephen V Wilson |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XIV |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 12, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Anthony Wesley Sherman, upon Defendant Andrew M Saul served on 7/31/2020, answer due 9/29/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. Original Summons NOT returned. (Attachments: #1 USPS - AUSA, #2 Certified Mail Receipts)(Yim, Young) |
| Filing 10 CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by Defendant Andrew M Saul. (Attorney Lara A Bradt added to party Andrew M Saul(pty:dft))(Bradt, Lara) |
| Filing 9 RESPONSE filed by Plaintiff Anthony Wesley Shermanto Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held, #8 (Attachments: #1 certificate of service)(Yim, Young) |
Filing 8
MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) Order re Possible Conflicts of Interest by Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth: No later than seven days from the date of this order, Plaintiff's counsel must file notice that ALJ Rosenbluth did or did not participate in or preside over Plaintiff's case. (See document for details.) (es)
|
|
Filing 7
CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER by Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth. *See document for details.* (es)
|
| Filing 6 60 DAY Summons issued re Complaint #1 as to defendant Andrew M Saul. (esa) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Stephen V. Wilson and referred to Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth. (esa) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties (Yim, Young) |
| Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 Anthony Wesley Sherman. (Yim, Young) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Anthony Wesley Sherman. (Yim, Young) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-27051846 - Fee: $400. (Attorney Young Bin Yim added to party Anthony Wesley Sherman(pty:pla))(Yim, Young) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Anthony Wesley Sherman v. Andrew M. Saul | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Anthony Wesley Sherman | |
| Represented By: | Young Bin Yim |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Andrew M Saul | |
| Represented By: | Assistant US Attorney LA-SSA |
| Represented By: | Assistant US Attorney LA-CV |
| Represented By: | Lara A Bradt |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
