Rita Goldmann v. Princess Cruise Lines, Ltd., et al
Rita Goldmann |
Princess Cruise Lines, Ltd. and Does 1 through 100, inclusive |
5:2020cv01370 |
July 8, 2020 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Jesus G Bernal |
Shashi H Kewalramani |
Marine |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 4, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 Third STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Princess Cruise Lines, Ltd. answer now due 9/10/2020, re Amended Complaint/Petition #10 filed by Defendant Princess Cruise Lines, Ltd..(Politis, Zachary) |
Filing 14 Second STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Princess Cruise Lines, Ltd. answer now due 9/8/2020, re Amended Complaint/Petition #10 filed by Defendant Princess Cruise Lines, Ltd..(Politis, Zachary) |
Filing 13 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Princess Cruise Lines, Ltd. answer now due 8/25/2020, re Amended Complaint/Petition #10 filed by Defendant Princess Cruise Lines, Ltd..(Attorney Zachary John Politis added to party Princess Cruise Lines, Ltd.(pty:dft))(Politis, Zachary) |
Filing 12 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Rita Goldmann, upon Defendant Princess Cruise Lines, Ltd. served on 7/28/2020, answer due 8/18/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Defendant Princess Cruise Lines Ltd. in compliance with statute not specified by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity.Original Summons NOT returned. (McNicholas, John) |
Filing 11 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Rita Goldmann, upon Defendant Princess Cruise Lines, Ltd. served on 7/16/2020, answer due 8/6/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon C.T. Corporation System in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity.Original Summons NOT returned. (McNicholas, John) |
Filing 10 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendants All Defendants amending Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 , filed by Plaintiff Rita Goldmann(McNicholas, John) |
Filing 9 STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Jesus G. Bernal. (ima) |
Filing 8 21 DAY Summons issued re Complaint #1 as to defendant Princess Cruise Lines, Ltd. (esa) |
Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (esa) |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Jesus G. Bernal and Magistrate Judge Shashi H. Kewalramani. (esa) |
Filing 5 NOTICE RE INTRA-DISTRICT TRANSFER by Clerk of Court due to incorrect intra-district venue selected by the filer. Case is transferred to the Eastern Division. Case has been assigned to Judge Jesus G. Bernal for all further proceedings. Any matters that may be referred to a Magistrate Judge are assigned to Shashi H. Kewalramani. New Case Number 5:20-cv-01370 JGB (SHKx). (esa) |
FILING FEE PAID for new civil case. Receipt No. ACACDC-27135703 for $400 filing fee. (McNicholas, John) |
Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Rita Goldmann, (McNicholas, John) |
Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Rita Goldmann. (McNicholas, John) |
Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Rita Goldmann. (McNicholas, John) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT, filed by Plaintiff Rita Goldmann. (Attorney John P McNicholas, III added to party Rita Goldmann(pty:pla))(McNicholas, John) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.