JUUL Labs, Inc. v. eCig-City
| JUUL Labs, Inc. |
| eCig-City |
| 5:2020cv01379 |
| July 10, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Maria A Audero |
| George H Wu |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. § 271 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 10, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 22
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S NOTICE OF MOTION AND UNOPPOSED MOTION TO STAY PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. Section 1659 by Judge George H. Wu granting #21 MOTION to Stay Case: Pursuant to Defendant's Notice of Motion and Unopposed Motion to Stay Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1659; it is hereby ORDERED that Defendant's Notice of Motion and Unopposed Motion to Stay Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1659 is hereby GRANTED; and it is further ORDERED that this civil action is stayed until the determination of the U.S. International Trade Commission in Investigation No. 337-TA-1211 becomes final. The Court sets a status conference re the ITC matter for May 13, 2021 at 8:30 a.m. The parties are to file a joint status report by May 10, 2021. (bm)
|
| Filing 21 First NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Stay Case pending International Trade Commission, Investigation No. 337-TA-1211 filed by Defendant, ECIG-CITY eCig-City. Motion set for hearing on 9/14/2020 at 08:30 AM before Judge George H. Wu. (Attachments: #1 Declaration DECLARATION OF ALLAN GRANT IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS NOTICE OF MOTION AND UNOPPOSED MOTION TO STAY PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. 1659, #2 Exhibit Exhibit A - Complaint, #3 Exhibit Exhibit B - Notice of Institution, #4 Proposed Order Proposed Order) (Grant, Allan) |
| Filing 20 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Plaintiff JUUL Labs, Inc., re Transferring Case purs GO 19-03 (Related Case)(CV-34), #17 , Order #18 served on 8/17/2020. (Maroulis, Victoria) |
| Filing 19 NOTICE of Related Case(s) filed by Plaintiff JUUL Labs, Inc.. (Maroulis, Victoria) |
|
Filing 18
STANDING ORDER RE FINAL PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCES FOR CIVIL JURY TRIALS BEFORE JUDGE GEORGE H. WU by Judge George H. Wu. (See document for details) (mrgo)
|
|
Filing 17
ORDER RE TRANSFER PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 19-03-Related Case- filed. Related Case No: 2:20-cv-06178 GW (MAAx). Case transferred from Judge Andre Birotte Jr to Judge George H. Wu for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 5:20-cv-01379 GW (MAAx). Signed by Judge George H. Wu (esa)
|
| Filing 16 Joint STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to eCig-City answer now due 9/3/2020, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiff JUUL Labs, Inc..(Maroulis, Victoria) |
| Filing 15 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Andrew M Holmes counsel for Plaintiff JUUL Labs, Inc.. Adding Andrew M. Holmes as counsel of record for Juul Labs, Inc. for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Plaintiff Juul Labs, Inc.. (Holmes, Andrew) |
| Filing 14 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Kevin P B Johnson counsel for Plaintiff JUUL Labs, Inc.. Adding Kevin P.B. Johnson as counsel of record for Juul Labs, Inc. for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Plaintiff Juul Labs, Inc.. (Johnson, Kevin) |
| Filing 13 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff JUUL Labs, Inc., upon Defendant eCig-City served on 7/14/2020, answer due 8/4/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Jordan Antonio, employee in charge in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Maroulis, Victoria) |
| Filing 12 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Victoria F Maroulis counsel for Plaintiff JUUL Labs, Inc.. Adding Victoria F. Maroulis as counsel of record for Juul Labs, Inc. for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Plaintiff Juul Labs, Inc.. (Maroulis, Victoria) |
|
Filing 11
STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. (cb)
|
|
Filing 10
NOTICE AND ORDER REGARDING TRANSFER AND/OR REASSIGNMENT OF PATENT CASE by Judge Jesus G. Bernal. Case transferred from Judge Jesus G. Bernal and Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym to Judge Andre Birotte, Jr. and Magistrate Judge Maria A. Audero for all further proceedings. Case number now reads 5:20-cv-01379-AB-MAAx. (iva)
|
| Filing 9 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to Defendant eCig-City. (lh) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Jesus G. Bernal and Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym. (lh) |
| Filing 6 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or a Trademark (Initial Notification) filed by JUUL Labs, Inc.. (Briggs, Todd) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Related Case(s) filed by Plaintiff JUUL Labs, Inc.. (Briggs, Todd) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff JUUL Labs, Inc., identifying Altria Group, Inc.. (Briggs, Todd) |
| Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiff JUUL Labs, Inc.. (Briggs, Todd) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff JUUL Labs, Inc.. (Briggs, Todd) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-27163700 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff JUUL Labs, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Ex A, #2 Exhibit Ex B, #3 Exhibit Ex C, #4 Exhibit Ex D) (Attorney Todd M Briggs added to party JUUL Labs, Inc.(pty:pla))(Briggs, Todd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
