Kenneth Roshaun Reid v. Pliler et al
| Kenneth Roshaun Reid |
| Warden Pliler and Felipe Martinez |
| 5:2020cv01420 |
| July 10, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Patricia Donahue |
| Dale S Fischer |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 7, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE of Assistant United States Attorney Elia Herrera on behalf of Respondent Felipe Martinez. (Attorney Elia Herrera added to party Felipe Martinez(pty:res))(Herrera, Elia) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF REFERENCE to a U.S. Magistrate Judge. This case has been assigned to the calendar of the Honorable District Judge Dale S. Fischer and referred to Magistrate Judge Patricia Donahue, who is authorized to consider preliminary matters and conduct all further hearings as may be appropriate or necessary. Pursuant to Local Rule 83-2.4, the Court must be notified within five (5) days of any address change. See notice for additional details. (Attachments: #1 CV-111 and CV-27) (ghap) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person In Federal Custody (28:2241) Case assigned to Judge Dale S. Fischer and referred to Magistrate Judge Patricia A Donahue.(Filing fee $ 5: FEE DUE), filed by petitioner Kenneth Roshaun Reid. (ghap) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
