Victor Manuel Jimenez v. Josie Gastelo
Victor Manuel Jimenez |
Josie Gastelo |
5:2020cv01430 |
July 16, 2020 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Dale S Fischer |
Rozella A Oliver |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 24, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 NOTIFICATION from Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals of case number assigned and briefing schedule. Appeal Docket No. 20-55869 assigned to Petition for Certificate of Appealability, #7 as to Petitioner Victor Manuel Jimenez. (hr) |
Filing 7 Appellant's Notice of Motion and Motion Request for Certificate of Appealability by Petitioner Victor Manuel Jimenez; Filed as Notice of Appeal to 9th CCA from District Court Judgment #5 filed 07/30/2020; Entered 7/30/2020. Certificate of Appealability ruled on 7/30/2020 see doc 4. (car) |
Filing 6 Request to Proceed Without Prepayment of Filing Fees filed by Petitioner Victor Manuel Jimenez. (dml) |
Filing 5 JUDGMENT by Judge Dale S. Fischer. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that this action is dismissed without prejudice for the reasons set forth in the related Order Summarily Dismissing Successive Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus for Lack of Jurisdiction and Denying Certificate of Appealability. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (dml) |
Filing 4 ORDER SUMMARILY DISMISSING SUCCESSIVE PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION AND DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY by Judge Dale S. Fischer. IT IS ORDERED THAT: 1. The Petition is DISMISSED without prejudice for lack of jurisdiction; and 2. A Certificate of Appealability is DENIED. See Order for details. (dml) |
Filing 3 NOTICE OF REFERENCE to a U.S. Magistrate Judge. This case has been assigned to the calendar of the Honorable District Judge Dale S. Fischer and referred to Magistrate Judge Rozella A. Oliver, who is authorized to consider preliminary matters and conduct all further hearings as may be appropriate or necessary. Pursuant to Local Rule 83-2.4, the Court must be notified within five (5) days of any address change. See notice for additional details. (Attachments: #1 CV-111) (lh) |
Filing 2 ELECTION REGARDING CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by Petitioner Victor Manuel Jimenez. (lh) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person In State Custody (28:2254). Case assigned to Judge Dale S. Fischer and referred to Magistrate Judge Rozella A. Oliver. (Filing Fee $ 5 Due), filed by Petitioner Victor Manuel Jimenez. (lh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Victor Manuel Jimenez v. Josie Gastelo | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Victor Manuel Jimenez | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: Josie Gastelo | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.