Markitta Stafford v. Fedex Corporate Services, Inc.
Plaintiff: Markitta Stafford
Defendant: Fedex Corporate Services, Inc. and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive
Case Number: 5:2020cv01441
Filed: July 21, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Jesus G Bernal
Referring Judge: Shashi H Kewalramani
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 19, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 19, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER by Judge Jesus G. Bernal: Granting #14 Non-Resident Attorney Barak J. Babcock APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of FedEx Corporate Services, Inc Defendant, designating Christopher J. Yost as local counsel. (twdb)
August 18, 2020 Filing 14 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Barak J. Babcock to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant Fedex Corporate Services, Inc. (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $400.00 Previously Paid on 8/18/2020, Receipt No. 27594896) filed by Defendant Fedex Corporate Services, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Attorney Christopher J Yost added to party Fedex Corporate Services, Inc.(pty:dft)) (Yost, Christopher)
August 12, 2020 Filing 13 NOTICE of Deficiency in Electronically Filed Pro Hac Vice Application RE: APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Barak J. Babcock to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant Fedex Corporate Services, Inc. (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $400 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-27594896) #12 . The following error(s) was/were found: Local Rule 83-2.1.3.4 Local counsel does not maintain an office within the District. DJ and MJ initials missing from caption and proposed order. (Thrasher, Lupe)
August 12, 2020 Filing 12 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Barak J. Babcock to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant Fedex Corporate Services, Inc. (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $400 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-27594896) filed by Defendant Fedex Corporate Services, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Stroup, Stephanie)
August 6, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Jesus G. Bernal. Scheduling Conference set for 10/19/2020 at 11:00 AM before Judge Jesus G. Bernal. (iva)
July 24, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 10 STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Jesus G. Bernal. (ima)
July 23, 2020 Filing 9 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil)
July 23, 2020 Filing 8 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Jesus G. Bernal and Magistrate Judge Shashi H. Kewalramani. (jtil)
July 21, 2020 CONFORMED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint filed by Defendant Fedex Corporate Services, Inc. on 7/20/2020, attached as Exhibit C. (jtil)
July 21, 2020 CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT filed by Plaintiff Markitta Stafford in Riverside Superior Court on 6/11/2020, attached as Exhibit 2. (jtil)
July 21, 2020 Filing 7 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Movant Fedex Corporate Services, Inc. identifying FedEx Corporation as Corporate Parent. (Stroup, Stephanie)
July 21, 2020 Filing 6 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Fedex Corporate Services, Inc., identifying FedEx Corporation. (Stroup, Stephanie)
July 21, 2020 Filing 5 NOTICE of Related Case(s) filed by Defendant Fedex Corporate Services, Inc.. (Stroup, Stephanie)
July 21, 2020 Filing 4 DECLARATION of Kristy Gunn re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Movant Fedex Corporate Services, Inc.. (Stroup, Stephanie)
July 21, 2020 Filing 3 DECLARATION of Heather R. Long re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Movant Fedex Corporate Services, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - CT Corp.'s Service of Process transmittal document, #2 Exhibit B - All State Court Pleadings, #3 Exhibit C - Answer to State Court Complaint, #4 Exhibit D - Stafford's Earnings History Report, #5 Exhibit E - Notice to State Court of Removal)(Stroup, Stephanie)
July 21, 2020 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Movant Fedex Corporate Services, Inc.. (Stroup, Stephanie)
July 21, 2020 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Riverside Superior Court, case number RIC2001626 Receipt No: ACACDC-27289128 - Fee: $400, filed by Defendant Fedex Corporate Services, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Complaint, #3 State Court Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Certificate of Counsel) (Attorney Stephanie Anne Stroup added to party Fedex Corporate Services, Inc.(pty:bkmov))(Stroup, Stephanie)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Markitta Stafford v. Fedex Corporate Services, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Fedex Corporate Services, Inc.
Represented By: Stephanie Anne Stroup
Represented By: Barak J. Babcock
Represented By: Christopher J Yost
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DOES 1 through 50, inclusive
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Markitta Stafford
Represented By: Young Kook Park
Represented By: Brent P Marlis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?