Jose Madriz v. Wilson Baugh Jr., D.D.S. et al
Plaintiff: Jose Madriz
Defendant: Wilson Baugh, Jr, The Baugh, Wilson B Jr Separate Property Trust 2017 and Wilson Baugh Jr., D.D.S.
Case Number: 5:2020cv01487
Filed: July 27, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Andre Birotte
Referring Judge: Shashi H Kewalramani
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 19, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 15, 2020 Filing 17 STIPULATION REGARDING SELECTION of Panel Mediator filed. Parties request that the ADR Program assign a Panel Mediator from the following area of law: Title III ADA. Filed by Plaintiff Jose Madriz(Valenti, Matt)
September 8, 2020 Filing 16 STATEMENT ADR Case Statement filed by Plaintiff Jose Madriz (Valenti, Matt)
August 25, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER by Judge Andre Birotte Jr.: Granting #13 APPLICATION to Stay Case re Early Mediation ADA Disability Access Litigation as to All Defendants. The ADR proceeding is to be completed no later than 11/20/2020. (gk)
August 18, 2020 Filing 14 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: APPLICATION to Stay Case and Early Mediation re ADA Disability Access Litigation, #13 . The following error(s) was/were found: Attached [Prop] Order is blank. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (lom)
August 14, 2020 Filing 13 APPLICATION to Stay Case and Early Mediation re ADA Disability Access Litigation, filed by Defendant The Baugh, Wilson B Jr Separate Property Trust 2017, Wilson Baugh Jr., D.D.S.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Attorney Zachary R Hagenbuch added to party The Baugh, Wilson B Jr Separate Property Trust 2017(pty:dft), Attorney Zachary R Hagenbuch added to party Wilson Baugh Jr., D.D.S.(pty:dft)) (Hagenbuch, Zachary)
August 5, 2020 Filing 12 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Defendant Jose Madriz, upon Defendant The Baugh, Wilson B Jr Separate Property Trust 2017 served on 7/30/2020, answer due 8/20/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Wilson Baugh Jr. D.D.S. as Trustee in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons returned. (Valenti, Matt)
August 5, 2020 Filing 11 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Jose Madriz, upon Defendant Wilson Baugh Jr., D.D.S. served on 7/30/2020, answer due 8/20/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Wilson Baugh Jr. D.D.S. in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons returned. (Valenti, Matt)
July 29, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 10 STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. (cb)
July 29, 2020 Filing 9 Notice to Parties: ADA Disability Access Litigation. (cb)
July 28, 2020 Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants The Baugh, Wilson B Jr Separate Property Trust 2017, Wilson Baugh Jr., D.D.S. (car)
July 28, 2020 Filing 7 Notice to counsel re consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge Eastern Division Blackout Case. (car)
July 28, 2020 Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car)
July 28, 2020 Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Andre Birotte Jr and Magistrate Judge Shashi H. Kewalramani. (car)
July 27, 2020 Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Jose Madriz, (Valenti, Matt)
July 27, 2020 Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Jose Madriz. (Valenti, Matt)
July 27, 2020 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Jose Madriz. (Valenti, Matt)
July 27, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-27376806 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Jose Madriz. (Attorney Matt D Valenti added to party Jose Madriz(pty:pla))(Valenti, Matt)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jose Madriz v. Wilson Baugh Jr., D.D.S. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Wilson Baugh, Jr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: The Baugh, Wilson B Jr Separate Property Trust 2017
Represented By: Zachary R Hagenbuch
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Wilson Baugh Jr., D.D.S.
Represented By: Zachary R Hagenbuch
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jose Madriz
Represented By: Matt D Valenti
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?