James Rutherford v. Valmor Limited, LP, et al
| JAMES RUTHERFORD, an individual and James Rutherford |
| DOES 1-10 Inclusive, VALMOR LIMITED, L.P., a California limited partnership, DOES 1-10, inclusive and Valmor Limited, LP |
| 5:2020cv01502 |
| July 28, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Virginia A Phillips |
| Sheri Pym |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 17, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Virginia A. Phillips. Scheduling Conference set for 12/7/2020 at 01:30 PM before Judge Virginia A. Phillips. (cch)
|
| Filing 13 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction #11 , Attachment 2: Request For Judicial Notice. The following error(s) was/were found: Attachment 2: Request for Judicial Notice should have been e-filed as a separate, stand-alone document from the motion using the event Responses/Replies/Other Motion Related Documents-For Judicial Notice In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (bm) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by defendant Valmor Limited, LP, (Weinberg, Catherine) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction filed by defendant Valmor Limited, LP. Motion set for hearing on 11/9/2020 at 02:00 PM before Judge Virginia A. Phillips. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum, #2 Request for Judicial Notice, #3 Proposed Order) (Attorney Catherine Joanne Weinberg added to party Valmor Limited, LP(pty:dft)) (Weinberg, Catherine) |
| Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff James Rutherford, upon Defendant Valmor Limited, LP served on 8/11/2020, answer due 9/1/2020. in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Manning, Joseph) |
|
Filing 9
STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Virginia A. Phillips. (cch)
|
| Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Valmor Limited, LP. (jtil) |
| Filing 7 Notice to counsel re consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge Eastern Division Blackout Case. (jtil) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Virginia A. Phillips and Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym. (jtil) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff JAMES RUTHERFORD, an individual. (Manning, Joseph) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff JAMES RUTHERFORD, an individual. (Manning, Joseph) |
| Filing 2 Certification and NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by plaintiff JAMES RUTHERFORD, an individual, (Manning, Joseph) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-27396300 - Fee: $400, filed by plaintiff JAMES RUTHERFORD, an individual. (Attorney Joseph Richard Manning, Jr added to party JAMES RUTHERFORD, an individual(pty:pla))(Manning, Joseph) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
