Timothy Mitchell Buterbaugh v. Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff: Timothy Mitchell Buterbaugh
Defendant: Commissioner Andrew M. Saul and Andrew M. Saul
Case Number: 5:2020cv01520
Filed: July 29, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Alexander F MacKinnon
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 3, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 17, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 14 NOTICE TO COUNSEL: ALL PARTIES having consented to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge, this case has been reassigned to Magistrate Judge Alexander F. MacKinnon for all further proceedings. Please use the case number EDCV20-1520 AFM on all documents subsequently filed to ensure the proper routing of all filings. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. TEXT ONLY ENTRY. (sn)
August 14, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 13 CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by Plaintiff Timothy Mitchell Buterbaugh. (Kuntz, William)
August 14, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 12 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Timothy Mitchell Buterbaugh, upon Defendant Andrew M. Saul served on 8/6/2020, answer due 12/4/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to C. Torres, Title Unknown,. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to Carly Sase, Title Unknown,. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by delivering a copy to Unknown Signer, Title Unknown, on behalf of General Counsel. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. Original Summons NOT returned. Case Management Orders were also served along with Complaint documents. (Attachments: #1 Certified Mail Return Receipts)(Kuntz, William)
August 13, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 11 CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by Defendant Andrew M. Saul. (Attorney Michael K Marriott added to party Andrew M. Saul(pty:dft))(Marriott, Michael)
July 31, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 10 SUPPLEMENTAL ORDER REGARDING FURTHER PROCEEDINGS by Magistrate Judge Alexander F. MacKinnon. Mandatory chambers copies of e-filed documents shall be delivered to the Magistrate Judge's box located outside the Clerks Office, 12th Floor, Roybal Federal Building and Courthouse, 255 East Temple Street, Los Angeles, California 90012, within twenty-four hours after e-filing. (et)
July 30, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 9 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Andrew M. Saul. (es)
July 30, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 8 (In Chambers): ORDER RE: PROCEDURES IN SOCIAL SECURITY APPEAL by Magistrate Judge Alexander F. MacKinnon. [See document for details.] (es)
July 30, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Alexander F. MacKinnon: granting #3 REQUEST to Proceed in Forma Pauperis with Declaration in Support (CV-60). (es)
July 29, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge David O. Carter and referred to Magistrate Judge Alexander F. MacKinnon. (lh)
July 29, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Timothy Mitchell Buterbaugh. (Kuntz, William)
July 29, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Timothy Mitchell Buterbaugh, identifying Unitied States of America and Social Security Administration. (Kuntz, William)
July 29, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, Declaration in Support filed by Plaintiff Timothy Mitchell Buterbaugh. (Kuntz, William)
July 29, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Timothy Mitchell Buterbaugh. (Kuntz, William)
July 29, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT with In Forma Pauperis request, filed by Plaintiff Timothy Mitchell Buterbaugh. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A) (Attorney William M Kuntz added to party Timothy Mitchell Buterbaugh(pty:pla))(Kuntz, William)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Timothy Mitchell Buterbaugh v. Andrew M. Saul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner Andrew M. Saul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Andrew M. Saul
Represented By: Michael K Marriott
Represented By: Assistant US Attorney LA-SSA
Represented By: Assistant US Attorney LA-CV
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Timothy Mitchell Buterbaugh
Represented By: William M Kuntz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?