Subash Khadka v. Chad T. Wolf et al
Petitioner: Subash Khadka
Respondent: David Marin, Chad T. Wolf, Gabriel Valdez, Warden and William Barr
Case Number: 5:2020cv01526
Filed: July 30, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Percy Anderson
Referring Judge: Jacqueline Chooljian
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 4, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 4, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER FOR STATUS REPORT by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Chooljian. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that within thirty (30) days, Respondents file a status report providing an update on the status of Petitioner's removal. Petitioner may file a response within seven (7) days of Respondents' status report. (es)
September 3, 2020 Filing 10 REPLY filed by Petitioner Subash Khadka in Support of Petition for Habeas Corpus (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Menninger, David)
August 21, 2020 Filing 9 RETURN to Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241), #1 filed by Respondents William Barr, David Marin, Gabriel Valdez, Chad T. Wolf. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Marinel Cortez, #2 Exhibits "A" - "I")(Pinchas, David)
August 7, 2020 Filing 8 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney David E Pinchas counsel for Respondents William Barr, David Marin, Gabriel Valdez, Chad T. Wolf. Adding David Pinchas as counsel of record for Chad Wolf, William Barr, David Marin and Gabriel Valdez for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by respondents Chad Wolf, William Barr, David Marin and Gabriel Valdez. (Attorney David E Pinchas added to party William Barr(pty:res), Attorney David E Pinchas added to party David Marin(pty:res), Attorney David E Pinchas added to party Gabriel Valdez(pty:res), Attorney David E Pinchas added to party Chad T. Wolf(pty:res))(Pinchas, David)
August 5, 2020 Filing 6 NOTICE OF CLERICAL ERROR: Due to clerical error Re: Order Requiring Return/Answer to Petition #4 . Incorrect document was attached to docket entry. Docket Item No. 4 be disregarded. Order will be re-docketed. (et)
July 31, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER REQUIRING ANSWER TO PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Chooljian. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: Within ten (10) days, respondent shall file and serve a notice of appearance. Respondent shall file an Answer to the Petition within twenty three(23) days of the date of this Order. Petitioner may file any Reply to the Answer within fourteen (14) days of the date that the Answer is filed. Notice: The court has issued a ruling on preliminary review. Pursuant to the Agreement on Acceptance of Service between the Clerk of Court and the United States Attorneys Office, this Notice constitutes service under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4. (Attachments: #1 Petition for writ of Habeas Corpus) (et)
July 31, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Chooljian: granting #2 EX PARTE APPLICATION for Appointment of Counsel. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Deputy Federal Public Defender David Menninger is appointed to represent petitioner Subash Khadka in the above-captioned matter. (et)
July 31, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 [NOTICE OF CLERICAL ERROR ISSUED ON 8/5/2020, SEE DOCKET ENTRY NO. #6 ]-ORDER REQUIRING ANSWER TO PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Chooljian. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: Within ten (10) days, respondent shall file and serve a notice of appearance. Respondent shall file an Answer to the Petition within twenty three(23) days of the date of this Order. Petitioner may file any Reply to the Answer within fourteen (14) days of the date that the Answer is filed. Notice: The court has issued a ruling on preliminary review. Pursuant to the Agreement on Acceptance of Service between the Clerk of Court and the United States Attorneys Office, this Notice constitutes service under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4. (et) Modified on 8/5/2020 (et).
July 31, 2020 Filing 3 NOTICE OF REFERENCE to a U.S. Magistrate Judge. This case has been assigned to the calendar of the Honorable District Judge Percy Anderson and referred to Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Chooljian, who is authorized to consider preliminary matters and conduct all further hearings as may be appropriate or necessary. Pursuant to Local Rule 83-2.4, the Court must be notified within five (5) days of any address change. See notice for additional details. (car)
July 30, 2020 Filing 2 EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR ORDER APPOINTING FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER; MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES; DECLARATION OF COUNSEL; EXHIBIT filed by Federal Public Defender on behalf of Petitioner Subash Khadka. (Attachments: #1 Lodged Proposed Order) (car)
July 30, 2020 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person In Federal Custody (28:2241); Memorandum of Points and Authorities. Case assigned to Judge Percy Anderson and referred to Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Chooljian.(Filing fee $ 5 FEE PAID), filed by Petitioner Subash Khadka. (car)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Subash Khadka v. Chad T. Wolf et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: David Marin
Represented By: OIL-DCS Trial Attorney
Represented By: Assistant 2241-194 US Attorney LA-CV
Represented By: David E Pinchas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Chad T. Wolf
Represented By: OIL-DCS Trial Attorney
Represented By: Assistant 2241-194 US Attorney LA-CV
Represented By: David E Pinchas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Gabriel Valdez
Represented By: OIL-DCS Trial Attorney
Represented By: Assistant 2241-194 US Attorney LA-CV
Represented By: David E Pinchas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Warden
Represented By: OIL-DCS Trial Attorney
Represented By: Assistant 2241-194 US Attorney LA-CV
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: William Barr
Represented By: OIL-DCS Trial Attorney
Represented By: Assistant 2241-194 US Attorney LA-CV
Represented By: David E Pinchas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Subash Khadka
Represented By: David Lee Menninger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?