Jose Madriz v. Harold Andrew Veum et al
Plaintiff: Jose Madriz
Defendant: Does 1-10, Harold Andrew Veum and Sue Veum
Case Number: 5:2020cv01532
Filed: July 31, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Kenly Kiya Kato
Referring Judge: Virginia A Phillips
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 16, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 16, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER OF DISMISSAL by Judge Virginia A. Phillips, re Notice of Settlement #14 : The Court having been advised by counsel for the parties that the above-entitled action has settled, IT IS ORDERED that this action be, and hereby is, dismissed in its entirety without prejudice. THE COURT will retain jurisdiction for a period of sixty (60) days to enforce the terms of the settlement. All pending dates are hereby vacated. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (bm)
September 11, 2020 Filing 14 NOTICE of Settlement and request to vacate all currently set dates filed by plaintiff Jose Madriz. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Seabock, Amanda)
August 21, 2020 Filing 13 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Katherine Sarah Schantz-Bekken counsel for Defendants Harold Andrew Veum, Sue Veum. Adding Katherine S. Bekken as counsel of record for Harold Andrew Veum, Sue Veum for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendants Harold Andrew Veum, Sue Veum. (Attorney Katherine Sarah Schantz-Bekken added to party Harold Andrew Veum(pty:dft), Attorney Katherine Sarah Schantz-Bekken added to party Sue Veum(pty:dft))(Schantz-Bekken, Katherine)
August 21, 2020 Filing 12 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Jose Madriz, upon Defendant Sue Veum served on 8/21/2020, answer due 9/25/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Stanley Veum (General Manager/ Son of Receipent) in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by substituted service at home address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons returned. (Handy, Russell)
August 21, 2020 Filing 11 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Jose Madriz, upon Defendant Harold Andrew Veum served on 8/21/2020, answer due 9/25/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Stanley Veum (General Manager/ Son of Receipent) in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by substituted service at home address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons returned. (Handy, Russell)
August 19, 2020 Filing 10 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Sue Veum answer now due 9/25/2020; Harold Andrew Veum answer now due 9/25/2020, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendants Sue Veum; Harold Andrew Veum.(Attorney Stacie Lynn Turner added to party Harold Andrew Veum(pty:dft), Attorney Stacie Lynn Turner added to party Sue Veum(pty:dft))(Turner, Stacie)
August 3, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 9 STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Virginia A. Phillips. (cch)
July 31, 2020 Filing 8 21 DAY Summons issued re Complaint #1 as to defendants Harold Andrew Veum, Sue Veum. (esa)
July 31, 2020 Filing 7 Notice to counsel re consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge Eastern Division Blackout Case. (esa)
July 31, 2020 Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (esa)
July 31, 2020 Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Virginia A. Phillips and Magistrate Judge Kenly Kiya Kato. (esa)
July 31, 2020 Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Jose Madriz. (Handy, Russell)
July 31, 2020 Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Jose Madriz, (Handy, Russell)
July 31, 2020 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Jose Madriz. (Handy, Russell)
July 31, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-27440545 - Fee: $400, filed by plaintiff Jose Madriz. (Attorney Russell C Handy added to party Jose Madriz(pty:pla))(Handy, Russell)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jose Madriz v. Harold Andrew Veum et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1-10
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Harold Andrew Veum
Represented By: Katherine Sarah Schantz-Bekken
Represented By: Stacie Lynn Turner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sue Veum
Represented By: Katherine Sarah Schantz-Bekken
Represented By: Stacie Lynn Turner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jose Madriz
Represented By: Amanda Lockhart Seabock
Represented By: Raymond George Ballister, Jr
Represented By: Dennis Jay Price, II
Represented By: Russell C Handy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?