Teresa Serna v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
| Ms Teresa E Serna |
| Social Security Administration and Commissioner of Social Security Administration |
| 5:2020cv01534 |
| July 31, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Pedro V Castillo |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XIV |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 27, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Teresa E Serna, upon Defendant Commissioner of Social Security Administration served on 8/11/2020, answer due 12/9/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to F DelaRosa. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to Emily Sase. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by delivering a copy to illegible. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. Original Summons NOT returned. (Monge, Troy) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE TO COUNSEL: ALL PARTIES having consented to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge, this case has been reassigned to Magistrate Judge Pedro V. Castillo for all further proceedings. Please use the case number EDCV20-1534 PVC on all documents subsequently filed to ensure the proper routing of all filings. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. TEXT ONLY ENTRY. (sn) |
| Filing 11 CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by Defendant Commissioner of Social Security Administration. (Attorney Armand D Roth added to party Commissioner of Social Security Administration(pty:dft))(Roth, Armand) |
Filing 10
ORDER RE: PROCEDURES IN SOCIAL SECURITY APPEAL (JOINT SUBMISSION FORMAT) by Magistrate Judge Pedro V. Castillo. Plaintiff will file an appropriate proof of service within 30 days of the date of this Order. (see document for further details) (hr)
|
| Filing 9 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Commissioner of Social Security Administration. (hr) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Pedro V. Castillo: granting #5 REQUEST to Proceed in Forma Pauperis with Declaration in Support (CV-60). (hr)
|
| Filing 7 CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by Plaintiff Teresa E Serna. (Monge, Troy) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Virginia A. Phillips and referred to Magistrate Judge Pedro V. Castillo. (et) |
| Filing 5 REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, Declaration in Support filed by Plaintiff Teresa E Serna. (Monge, Troy) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 , Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 , Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #3 filed by Plaintiff Teresa E Serna. (Monge, Troy) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Teresa E Serna, (Monge, Troy) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Teresa E Serna. (Monge, Troy) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with In Forma Pauperis request, filed by Plaintiff Teresa E Serna. (Attorney Troy Dana Monge added to party Teresa E Serna(pty:pla))(Monge, Troy) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
