Joshua Ponder v. Seegrid Corporation et al
Plaintiff: Joshua Ponder
Defendant: Seegrid Corporation, The Raymond Corporation and Does 1 to 25
Case Number: 5:2020cv01565
Filed: August 6, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Jesus G Bernal
Referring Judge: Shashi H Kewalramani
Nature of Suit: Personal Inj. Prod. Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: Defendant
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 7, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 17, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Jesus G. Bernal. Scheduling Conference set for 10/26/2020 at 11:00 AM before Judge Jesus G. Bernal. (iva)
August 11, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Jesus G. Bernal. (ima)
August 7, 2020 Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car)
August 7, 2020 Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Jesus G. Bernal and Magistrate Judge Shashi H. Kewalramani. (car)
August 6, 2020 NON-CONFORMED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery) filed by Defendant The Raymond Corporation. Submitted with Attachment 1 Exhibit B to Notice of Removal #1 (car)
August 6, 2020 CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Does 1 to 25, Seegrid Corporation, The Raymond Corporation., filed by Plaintiff Joshua Ponder. Filed in State Court on 6/12/2020 Submitted with Exhibit A to Notice of Removal #1 (car)
August 6, 2020 Filing 4 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by Defendant The Raymond Corporation, Certificate of Service of Notice to Adverse Party of Removal to Federal Court served on August 6, 2020. (Dabrowski, Steven)
August 6, 2020 Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant The Raymond Corporation, (Dabrowski, Steven)
August 6, 2020 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant The Raymond Corporation. (Dabrowski, Steven)
August 6, 2020 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Riverside Superior, case number RIC2001698 Receipt No: ACACDC-27525102 - Fee: $400, filed by Defendant The Raymond Corporation. (Attorney Steven A Dabrowski added to party The Raymond Corporation(pty:dft))(Dabrowski, Steven)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Joshua Ponder v. Seegrid Corporation et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Seegrid Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: The Raymond Corporation
Represented By: Steven A Dabrowski
Represented By: Anthony E Sonnett
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1 to 25
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Joshua Ponder
Represented By: Bradley P Knypstra
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?