Laphill Knox v. Express Messenger Systems, Inc. et al
| Laphill Knox |
| EXPRESS MESSENGER SYSTEMS, INC, d/b/a ONTRACT, a Delware corporation, Express Messenger Systems, Inc. a Delaware corporation doing business as Ontrac and Does 1 through 50, inclusive |
| 5:2020cv01568 |
| August 6, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Jesus G Bernal |
| Kenly Kiya Kato |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 29, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 STIPULATION for Order TO ARBITRATE CASE filed by Plaintiff Laphill Knox. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Leifer, Deanna) |
| Filing 13 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by Defendant Express Messenger Systems, Inc., served on 8/17/2020. (Pan, Amis) |
Filing 12
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Jesus G. Bernal. Scheduling Conference set for 10/26/2020 at 11:00 AM before Judge Jesus G. Bernal. (iva)
|
| Filing 11 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by Defendant Express Messenger Systems, Inc., served on 8/11/2020. (Pan, Amis) |
|
Filing 10
STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Jesus G. Bernal. (ima)
|
| Filing 9 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Jesus G. Bernal and Magistrate Judge Kenly Kiya Kato. (et) |
| Filing 7 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by Defendant EXPRESS MESSENGER SYSTEMS, INC, d/b/a ONTRACT, a Delware corporation, served on 8/06/2020. (Pan, Amis) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF ANSWER TO PLAINTIFF'S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT filed by Defendant Express Messenger Systems, Inc. [FILED IN STATE COURT ON 8/3/2020 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO EXHIBIT H TO DECLARATION of Amis Pan #2 . (et) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendants Does 1 through 50, inclusive, Express Messenger Systems, Inc., filed by Plaintiff Laphill Knox [FILED IN STATE COURT ON 6/15/2020 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO EXHIBIT B TO DECLARATION of Amis Pan #2 . (et) |
| CONFORMED (ENDORSED) E-FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Express Messenger Systems, Inc.,Does 1 through 50, inclusive. Jury Demanded., filed by Plaintiff Laphill Knox. [FILED IN STATE COURT ON 5/29/2020 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO EXHIBIT A TO DECLARATION of Amis Pan #2 . (et) |
| Filing 6 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant EXPRESS MESSENGER SYSTEMS, INC, d/b/a ONTRACT, a Delware corporation, (Pan, Amis) |
| Filing 5 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendant EXPRESS MESSENGER SYSTEMS, INC, d/b/a ONTRACT, a Delware corporation (Pan, Amis) |
| Filing 4 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant EXPRESS MESSENGER SYSTEMS, INC, d/b/a ONTRACT, a Delware corporation. (Pan, Amis) |
| Filing 3 DECLARATION of Richard Chase re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendant EXPRESS MESSENGER SYSTEMS, INC, d/b/a ONTRACT, a Delware corporation. (Pan, Amis) |
| Filing 2 DECLARATION of Amis Pan re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendant EXPRESS MESSENGER SYSTEMS, INC, d/b/a ONTRACT, a Delware corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H)(Pan, Amis) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from San Bernardino County Superior Court, case number CIVD2009453 Receipt No: ACACDC-27527323 - Fee: $400. (Attorney Amis Pan added to party EXPRESS MESSENGER SYSTEMS, INC, d/b/a ONTRACT, a Delware corporation(pty:dft))(Pan, Amis) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
