Jas. R. et al v. Alta Loma School District
| Jas. R. and J. M. |
| Alta Loma School District |
| 5:2020cv01583 |
| August 10, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Jesus G Bernal |
| Sheri Pym |
| Civil Rights: Education |
| 20 U.S.C. § 1400 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 8, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 20 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Alta Loma School District, (Stein, Shiva) |
| Filing 19 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss First Amended Complaint filed by Defendant Alta Loma School District. Motion set for hearing on 11/9/2020 at 09:00 AM before Judge Jesus G. Bernal. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Motion of Alta Loma School District to Dismiss Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint, #2 Declaration of Shiva E. Stein in Support of Defendant Alta Loma School District's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint, #3 Proposed Order) (Stein, Shiva) |
| Filing 18 REPLY in support NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Appointment of J.M. as Guardian ad Litem for Jas.R. #14 filed by Plaintiffs J. M., Jas. R.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of J.M., #2 Exhibit 1)(Nolte, John) |
| Filing 17 MEMORANDUM in Opposition to NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Appointment of J.M. as Guardian ad Litem for Jas.R. #14 filed by Defendant Alta Loma School District. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Shiva E. in Support of Defendant Alta Loma School District's Opposition, in part, to Plaintiffs' Motion to Appoint Mother as Guardian Ad Litem, #2 Proposed Order)(Stein, Shiva) |
Filing 16
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym: Order Denying Petition for Appointment of Guardian Ad Litem #7 . The court now sets a hearing on this motion for October 20, 2020 at 10:00 a.m. before the Magistrate Judge (SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS). (kca)
|
|
Filing 15
ORDER REFERRING TO THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Plaintiffs' Motion for Appointment of Guardian Ad Litem (Dkt. No. #14 ) filed on September 14, 2020, is hereby referred to the Magistrate Judge. The hearing set for October 19, 2020 before Judge Bernal is hereby vacated. IT IS SO ORDERED. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (iva) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
|
| Filing 14 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Appointment of J.M. as Guardian ad Litem for Jas.R. filed by Plaintiffs J. M., Jas. R.. Motion set for hearing on 10/19/2020 at 09:00 AM before Judge Jesus G. Bernal. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum, #2 Declaration, #3 Proposed Order) (Nolte, John) |
| Filing 13 First AMENDED COMPLAINT against defendant Alta Loma School District amending Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 , filed by plaintiffs Jas. R., J. M.(Nolte, John) |
| Filing 12 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Brandon A Lallande counsel for Defendant Alta Loma School District. Adding Brandon A. Lallande as counsel of record for Alta Loma School District for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendant Alta Loma School District. (Attorney Brandon A Lallande added to party Alta Loma School District(pty:dft))(Lallande, Brandon) |
| Filing 11 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Shiva E Stein counsel for Defendant Alta Loma School District. Adding Shiva E. Stein as counsel of record for Alta Loma School District for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendant Alta Loma School District. (Attorney Shiva E Stein added to party Alta Loma School District(pty:dft))(Stein, Shiva) |
| Filing 10 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym: Order Denying Petition for Appointment of Guardian Ad Litem #7 . No later than September 14, 2020, plaintiffs counsel must propose to the court an alternative, non-conflicted guardian ad litem (SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS). (kca) |
| Filing 9 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by plaintiffs Jas. R., J. M.. upon Alta Loma School District waiver sent by Plaintiff on 8/10/2020, answer due 10/9/2020. Waiver of Service signed by Jonathan Read. (Nolte, John) |
|
Filing 8
STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Jesus G. Bernal. (ima)
|
| Filing 7 PETITION for Appointment of J.M. as Guardian ad Litem for Jas.R. filed by plaintiffs J. M., Jas. R.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Nolte, John) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 . The following error(s) was found: It appears a guardian ad litem is named in this case but no Petition seeking such appointment has been filed. A Petition for the Appointment of a Guardian Ad Litem must be filed when the appointment of a guardian ad litem is required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 17(c)(2). See Local Rule 17-1. Counsel must file a Petition for the Appointment of a Guardian Ad Litem immediately. Failure to do so may be addressed by judicial action, including sanctions. See Local Rule 83-7. (ghap) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Jesus G. Bernal and Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym. (ghap) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiffs All Plaintiffs, (Nolte, John) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiffs J. M., Jas. R.. (Nolte, John) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-27553850 - Fee: $400, filed by plaintiffs Jas. R., J. M.. (Attorney John Gregory Nolte added to party J. M.(pty:pla), Attorney John Gregory Nolte added to party Jas. R.(pty:pla))(Nolte, John) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
