Vanessa Ruiz v. Stewart Title of California, Inc. et al
Vanessa Ruiz |
DCR Workfroce Inc., Does 1-20, Stewart Title Company, Cheryl Allen, Stewart Title of California, Inc. and Dianna Price |
5:2020cv01591 |
August 10, 2020 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Jesus G Bernal |
Shashi H Kewalramani |
Labor: Family and Medical Leave Act |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 18, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 SUPPLEMENT to Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendant Stewart Title of California, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Graffeo, Eric) |
Filing 11 ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Jesus G. Bernal. Scheduling Conference set for 11/2/2020 at 11:00 AM before Judge Jesus G. Bernal. (iva) |
Filing 10 STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Jesus G. Bernal. (ima) |
Filing 9 EXHIBIT Filed filed by Defendant Stewart Title of California, Inc.. as to Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 . (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A In Support of Notice of Removal, #2 Exhibit B In Support of Notice of Removal)(Graffeo, Eric) |
Filing 8 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) |
Filing 7 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Jesus G. Bernal and Magistrate Judge Shashi H. Kewalramani. (lh) |
Filing 6 NOTICE RE INTRA-DISTRICT TRANSFER by Clerk of Court due to incorrect intra-district venue selected by the filer. Case is transferred to the Eastern Division. Case has been assigned to Judge Jesus G. Bernal for all further proceedings. Any matters that may be referred to a Magistrate Judge are assigned to Shashi H. Kewalramani. New Case Number 5:20-cv-01591 JGB (SHKx). (lh) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Related Case(s) filed by Defendant Stewart Title of California, Inc.. Related Case(s): No Related Case (Graffeo, Eric) |
Filing 4 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendant Stewart Title of California, Inc. identifying VANESSA RUIZ, Plaintiff; STEWART TITLE OF CALIFORNIA, INC., Defendant; STEWART TITLE COMPANY, Defendant; DCR WORKFORCE INC., Defendant; DIANNA PRICE, Defendant; CHERYL ALLEN, Defendant; STEWART TITLE COMPANY, parent company of STEWART TITLE OF CALIFORNIA, INC; STEWART TITLE GUARANTY COMPANY, parent company of STEWART TITLE COMPANY; STEWART INFORMATION SERVICES CORPORATION, parent company of STEWART TITLE GUARANTY COMPANY; BLACKROCK FUND ADVISORS, owner of more than 10% of as Corporate Parent. (Graffeo, Eric) |
Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Stewart Title of California, Inc., identifying VANESSA RUIZ, Plaintiff; STEWART TITLE OF CALIFORNIA, INC., Defendant; STEWART TITLE COMPANY, Defendant; DCR WORKFORCE INC., Defendant; DIANNA PRICE, Defendant; CHERYL ALLEN, Defendant; STEWART TITLE COMPANY, parent company of STEWART TITLE OF CALIFORNIA, INC; STEWART TITLE GUARANTY COMPANY, parent company of STEWART TITLE COMPANY; STEWART INFORMATION SERVICES CORPORATION, parent company of STEWART TITLE GUARANTY COMPANY; BLACKROCK FUND ADVISORS, owner of more than 10% of. (Graffeo, Eric) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Stewart Title of California, Inc.. (Graffeo, Eric) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from San Bernardino Superior Court, case number CIVDS2008691 Receipt No: ACACDC-27560006 - Fee: $400, filed by Defendant Stewart Title of California, Inc.. (Attorney Eric J Graffeo added to party Stewart Title of California, Inc.(pty:dft))(Graffeo, Eric) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.