Monica Munoz v. Ross Avaiation Operations, LLC et al
Monica Munoz |
DOES 1 through 20, inclusive, Ross Avaiation Operations, LLC, a Delaware Corporation, Claudia Aceves and Ross Avaiation Operations, LLC |
5:2020cv01851 |
September 9, 2020 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Cormac J Carney |
Sheri Pym |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 22, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendant Ross Avaiation Operations, LLC, a Delaware Corporation identifying Ross Aviation Investments, LLC as Corporate Parent. (Kelly, Christopher) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Interesed Parties filed by Defendant Ross Avaiation Operations, LLC, a Delaware Corporation. (Kelly, Christopher) |
Filing 2 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Superior Court, County of Riverside, Palm Springs, case number PSC2003508 with filing fee previously paid ($400.00 paid on 09/09/2020, receipt number 016895), filed by Defendant Ross Avaiation Operations, LLC, a Delaware Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B) (Attorney Christopher Joseph Kelly added to party Ross Avaiation Operations, LLC, a Delaware Corporation(pty:dft))(Kelly, Christopher) |
Filing 1 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Ross Avaiation Operations, LLC, a Delaware Corporation. (Kelly, Christopher) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.