John Brandstetter v. City of Riverside et al
| John Brandstetter |
| Does 1 through 10, all sued in their individual capacities, Police Chief Larry V. Gonzalez, City of Riverside, Jolynn Turner and Riverside Police Department |
| 5:2020cv01866 |
| September 9, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Andre Birotte |
| Shashi H Kewalramani |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 19, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. Scheduling Conference set for 2/5/2021 at 10:00 AM before Judge Andre Birotte Jr. (cb)
|
| Filing 13 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 with JURY DEMAND filed by Defendants Larry V. Gonzalez(an individual), City of Riverside, Jolynn Turner. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Interested Parties)(Attorney Aaron Lewis Chandler added to party Larry V. Gonzalez(pty:dft), Attorney Aaron Lewis Chandler added to party City of Riverside(pty:dft), Attorney Aaron Lewis Chandler added to party Jolynn Turner(pty:dft))(Chandler, Aaron) |
| Filing 12 21-Day Summons Issued re Complaint #1 as to Defendants City of Riverside, Riverside Police Department, Chief Police Chief Larry V. Gonzalez, Riverside Police Det. Jolynn Turner, and Does 1 through 10, all sued in their individual capacities. (gk) |
|
Filing 11
STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. (cb)
|
| Filing 10 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff John Brandstetter. (Cook, Donald) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Request to Issue Summons RE: Summons Request #4 . The following error(s) was found: The caption of the summons must match the caption of the complaint verbatim. If the caption is too large to fit in the space provided, enter the name of the first party and then write see attached.Next, attach a face page of the complaint or a second page addendum to the Summons. The summons cannot be issued until this defect has been corrected. Please correct the defect and re-file your request. (car) |
| Filing 8 Notice to counsel re consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge Eastern Division Blackout Case. (car) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Andre Birotte Jr and Magistrate Judge Shashi H. Kewalramani. (car) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE RE INTRA-DISTRICT TRANSFER by Clerk of Court due to incorrect intra-district venue selected by the filer. Case is transferred to the Eastern Division. Case has been assigned to Judge Andre Birotte Jr for all further proceedings. Any matters that may be referred to a Magistrate Judge are assigned to Shashi H. Kewalramani. New Case Number 5:20-cv-01866-AB-SHKx. (car) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff John Brandstetter. (Cook, Donald) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff John Brandstetter, identifying John Brandstetter. (Cook, Donald) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff John Brandstetter. (Cook, Donald) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-28004245 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff John Brandstetter. (Attorney Donald Webster Cook added to party John Brandstetter(pty:pla))(Cook, Donald) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
