Terry Smith v. State of California
| Terry Smith |
| State of California |
| 5:2020cv01932 |
| September 18, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Michael W Fitzgerald |
| Alicia G Rosenberg |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 25, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case filed by Respondent State of California. (Beesley, Christopher) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION TO DISMISS THE PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS re REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, Declaration in Support #6 filed by Respondent State of California. (Beesley, Christopher) |
| Filing 11 RESPONSE BY THE COURT TO NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES IN ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOCUMENTS RE: Return to Habeas Petition (2254) #8 by Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg. The document is stricken and counsel is ordered to file an amended or corrected document by as soon as possible. (kl) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Return to Habeas Petition (2254) #8 . The following error(s) was/were found: Incorrect event selected. Correct event to be used is: Motions and Related Filings - Dismiss Case. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (kl) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF LODGING filed In 28 U.S.C. Section 2254 Habeas Corpus Case re Return to Habeas Petition (2254) #8 (Attachments: #1 Lodgment 1, #2 Lodgment 2, #3 Lodgment 3)(Beesley, Christopher) |
| Filing 8 ***STRICKEN PER ORDER #11 ***Answer to Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2254) #1 Notice of Motion and Motion to Dismiss The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Respondent State of California.(Beesley, Christopher) Modified on 10/26/2020 (kl). |
| Filing 7 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg: granting #6 REQUEST to Proceed in Forma Pauperis with Declaration in Support (CV-60). (hr) |
| Filing 6 DECLARATION IN SUPPORT OF REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS filed by Petitioner Terry Smith. (kl) |
| Filing 5 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Christopher P Beesley counsel for Respondent State of California. Adding Christopher P. Beesley as counsel of record for State of California for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Respondent State of California. (Attorney Christopher P Beesley added to party State of California(pty:res))(Beesley, Christopher) |
Filing 4
ORDER REQUIRING A RESPONSE/ANSWER TO PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS (28 U.S.C. 2254) by Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg. Within 14 days of the date of this Order, Respondent shall serve and file a Notice of Appearance notifying the court of the name of the attorney who will have principal charge of the case, together with the address where the attorney may be served, and the attorney's telephone and fax number. Respondent State of California file Answer to the Petition not later than 12/7/2020. Motions to Dismiss shall be filed by 11/23/2020. Notice: The court has issued a ruling on preliminary review. Pursuant to the Agreement on Acceptance of Service between the Clerk of Court and the California Attorney Generals Office, this Notice constitutes service under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4. (See Order for Further Details) (Attachments: #1 Petition) (kl)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF REFERENCE to a U.S. Magistrate Judge. This case has been assigned to the calendar of the Honorable District Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald and referred to Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg, who is authorized to consider preliminary matters and conduct all further hearings as may be appropriate or necessary. Pursuant to Local Rule 83-2.4, the Court must be notified within five (5) days of any address change. See notice for additional details. (jtil) (Additional attachment(s) added on 9/18/2020: #1 CV111/CV69) (jtil). |
| Filing 2 ELECTION REGARDING CONSENT to Proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge Declined, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636c filed by Petitioner Terry Smith. The Petitioner does not consent. (jtil) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person In State Custody (28:2254), filed by Petitioner Terry Smith. Case assigned to Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald and referred to Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg. (jtil) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Terry Smith v. State of California | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Terry Smith | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: State of California | |
| Represented By: | Christopher P Beesley |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
