Suzanne Tanis v. Southwest Airlines Co. et al
| Suzanne Tanis |
| Southwest Airlines Co. and Does 1 through 10, inclusive |
| 5:2020cv01959 |
| September 21, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Kenly Kiya Kato |
| John A Kronstadt |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 18, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
ORDER SETTING RULE 16(b)/26(f) SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge John A. Kronstadt. Counsel shall file a Joint Report consistent with this Order. A hearing is not necessary and, therefore, the matter is taken under submission. Upon review of the Joint Report, a scheduling order will be issued. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 1/4/2021. (vv)
|
| Filing 12 DEFENDANT SOUTHWEST AIRLINES CO.S NOTICE OF INTERESTED PARTIES AND DISCLOSURE STATEMENT IN COMPLIANCE WITH FRCP 7.1 AND LOCAL RULE 7.1-1 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Southwest Airlines Co., identifying Southwest Airlines Co.. (James, Johnnie) |
| Filing 11 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 Defendant Southwest Airlines Co.'s Answer to Plaintiff's Complaint filed by Defendant Southwest Airlines Co..(Attorney Johnnie A James added to party Southwest Airlines Co.(pty:dft))(James, Johnnie) |
|
Filing 10
STANDING ORDERS FOR CIVIL CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JOHN A. KRONSTADT upon filing of the complaint by Judge John A. Kronstadt. Please read each Order carefully as they differ in some respects from the Local Rules. Counsel are advised that the Court, at any time, may amend one or more of its Standing Orders. It is the responsibility of counsel to refer to this Court&s Procedures and Schedules found on the website for the United States District Court, Central District of California (www.cacd.uscourts.gov) to obtain the operative order. The Court thanks the parties and their counsel for their anticipated cooperation in carrying out these requirements. (vv)
|
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 . The following error(s) was found: Other error(s) with document(s): Attachments 1 Civil Cover Sheet is attached to the Complaint. Each of these documents should have been filed and entered separately under its correct event/relief. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (ghap) |
| Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Southwest Airlines Co. (ghap) |
| Filing 7 Notice to counsel re consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge Eastern Division Blackout Case. (ghap) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge John A. Kronstadt and Magistrate Judge Kenly Kiya Kato. (ghap) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Suzanne Tanis. (Mehtani, Aanand) |
| Filing 3 Notice and CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Suzanne Tanis, (Mehtani, Aanand) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Suzanne Tanis. (Mehtani, Aanand) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-28171349 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Suzanne Tanis. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Attorney Aanand Mehtani added to party Suzanne Tanis(pty:pla))(Mehtani, Aanand) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
