Thermax Inc. v. Coachillin Energy Co., LLC
| Thermax Inc. |
| Coachillin Energy Co., LLC |
| 5:2020cv01984 |
| September 24, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Dale S Fischer |
| Kenly Kiya Kato |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 28, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 24 STIPULATION to Dismiss Case pursuant to FRCP 41(a) filed by plaintiff Thermax Inc..(Tedesco, Thomas) |
| Filing 23 TEXT ONLY ENTRY: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER RE NOTICE OF DISMISSAL. Plaintiff filed a notice dismissal of this action on December 21, 2020. Pursuant to Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, once an answer or motion for summary judgment has been served by the adverse party, dismissal may only be effected by a stipulation or order of Court. The documents at #21 and #22 are stricken. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (rfi) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
| Filing 22 ** STRICKEN** NOTICE Notice of Dismissal Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 41(a) or (c) filed by plaintiff Thermax Inc.. (Tedesco, Thomas) Modified on 12/28/2020 (rfi). |
| Filing 21 ** STRICKEN ** NOTICE filed by Plaintiff Thermax Inc.. Notice of Dismissal Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 41(a) or (c) (Tedesco, Thomas) Modified on 12/28/2020 (rfi). |
| Filing 20 DECLARATION of Thomas J. Tedesco re Text Only Scheduling Notice,,,,,,,,,,, 19 RE: OSC RE: Sanctions for Failure to File Rule 26(f) Report filed by Plaintiff Thermax Inc.. (Tedesco, Thomas) |
Filing 19
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE SANCTIONS. This overburdened court and its staff do not have time to communicate repeatedly with counsel in an effort to have them follow this Court's rules and orders. Counsel have failed to comply with the Court's Order Setting Scheduling Conference and the attached Schedule of Pretrial and Trial Dates in one or more respects. For example, counsel may have (1) failed to file a Joint 26(f) Report at all, (2) failed to provide all of the information required by the Order, (3) failed to attach a Schedule, or (4) failed to complete the Schedule properly. Counsel are ordered to show cause why each side should not be sanctioned in the amount of $500 for their failure to comply with the Order. Counsel whose signature appears on the Joint 26(f) Report must file a declaration stating who was (1) responsible for meeting with opposing counsel, (2) responsible for preparing and reviewing the Report and ensuring its accuracy and compliance with the Order, and (3) responsible for filing the Report. The declaration should state that persons name (only if the person is an attorney) and the person's position (partner, associate, paralegal, assistant, secretary, etc.). The declaration shall also state why the Report failed to comply with the Order. If no Report was filed, the declaration must state who was (1) responsible for calendaring the date for meeting with counsel and filing the Report, (2) responsible for responsible for meeting with opposing counsel, and (3) responsible for filing the Report. The same information as to name and position must be provided as well as an explanation as to why no Report was filed. In addition, the parties are ordered to review the Court's Order Setting Scheduling Conference and the attached Schedule of Pretrial and Trial Dates carefully, and to provide a Report and a Schedule that provides specific dates for all of the relevant items in the Schedule. The dates must comply with the time frames in the "weeks before trial" column and the required days of the week: a Monday (not a holiday) for the pretrial conference and last day for hearing motions and a Tuesday (not a holiday) for trial. The declarations, Report, and Schedule are due within five Court days. The filing of compliant declarations, Report, and Schedule will be a sufficient response to this Order to Show Cause. The scheduling conference date is vacated. The parties are urged to conduct themselves in a professional manner and to make every effort to agree on dates. Further failures to comply with this Court's rules and orders, including the rules and orders of the Central District, will result in sanctions against one or both parties.THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (rfi) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
|
| Filing 18 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Coachillin Energy Co., LLC, (Zundel, J) |
| Filing 17 RESPONSE BY THE COURT TO NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES IN ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOCUMENTS RE: Answer to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #14 , Deficiency in Electronically Filed Documents (G-112A) - optional html form, #16 by Deputy Clerk of Court. The Document is Accepted; however, the parties must file their Notice of Interested parties no later than November 23, 2020. (rfi) |
| Filing 16 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Answer to Complaint filed by Defendant Coachillin Energy Co., LLC #14 . The following error(s) was/were found: (1) No Notice of Interested Parties and/or no copies. (2) Counsel must be comply with L.R.7-1. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (jp) |
|
Filing 15
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Dale S. Fischer. The Joint Report must include the completed Schedule of Pretrial and Trial dates. Lead trial counsel are ordered to appear in person unless counsel have been excused by the Court. Scheduling Conference set for 12/21/2020 at 11:00 AM before Judge Dale S. Fischer. (rfi)
|
| Filing 14 ANSWER to Amended Complaint/Petition, #11 with JURY DEMAND filed by Defendant Coachillin Energy Co., LLC.(Attorney J Scott Zundel added to party Coachillin Energy Co., LLC(pty:dft))(Zundel, J) |
| Filing 13 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Thermax Inc., upon Defendant Coachillin Energy Co., LLC served on 10/22/2020, answer due 11/12/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Sarah Nayfack, Manager in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Tedesco, Thomas) |
|
Filing 12
TEXT ONLY ENTRY (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER by Judge Dale S. Fischer: The order to show cause re dismissal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction is DISCHARGED.THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (rfi) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
|
| Filing 11 First AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendant Coachillin Energy Co., LLC amending Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 , filed by Plaintiff Thermax Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit)(Tedesco, Thomas) |
|
Filing 10
Order to Show Cause re Dismissal for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction by Judge Dale S. Fischer that Plaintiff is ordered to file an amended complaint no later than 10/21/2020 correcting the jurisdictional allegations. (jp)
|
|
Filing 9
STANDING ORDER FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE DALE S. FISCHER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Dale S. Fischer. If a party would be entitled to attorneys fees, counsel are referred to the Order Re Fees found on Court&s website under Judge Fischer&s Procedures and Schedules contained in the Judge&s Requirements tab. Read all Orders carefully. They govern this case and differ in some respects from the Local Rules. COUNSEL ARE ORDERED TO PROVIDE A MANDATORY CHAMBERS COPY OF THE COMPLAINT, NOTICE OF REMOVAL, AND ANY OTHER INITIATING DOCUMENTS. (rfi)
|
| Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Coachillin Energy Co., LLC. (et) |
| Filing 7 Notice to counsel re consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge Eastern Division Blackout Case. (et) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dale S. Fischer and Magistrate Judge Kenly Kiya Kato. (et) |
| Filing 4 Corporate Disclosure Statement and CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Thermax Inc., (Tedesco, Thomas) |
| Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiff Thermax Inc.. (Tedesco, Thomas) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Thermax Inc.. (Tedesco, Thomas) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-28236291 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Thermax Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit "A", #2 Exhibit Exhibit "B", #3 Exhibit Exhibit "C", #4 Exhibit Exhibit "D") (Attorney Thomas J Tedesco added to party Thermax Inc.(pty:pla))(Tedesco, Thomas) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Thermax Inc. v. Coachillin Energy Co., LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Thermax Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Thomas J Tedesco |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Coachillin Energy Co., LLC | |
| Represented By: | J Scott Zundel |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
