Michae Lamar Vanderwood v. Mona D. Huston
| Michael Lamar Vanderwood and Acting Warden Mona Huston |
| Mona D. Huston |
| 5:2020cv02064 |
| October 5, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Percy Anderson |
| Patricia Donahue |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 20, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 REPLY support NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Stay Case pending exhaustion of unexhausted claims #6 filed by Petitioner Michael Lamar Vanderwood. (Schraer, George) |
Filing 11
ORDER GRANTING PERMISSION TO FILE POINTS AND AUTHORITIES REPLYING TO RESPONDENT'S PARTIAL OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR STAY by Magistrate Judge Patricia Donahue, re Request for Leave to File #10 . Petitioner shall file the document within 10 days of the date of this order. (hr)
|
| Filing 10 REQUEST for Leave to file supplemental points and authorities filed by petitioner Michael Lamar Vanderwood. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Declaration proof of service) (Schraer, George) |
| Filing 9 OPPOSITION to NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Stay Case pending exhaustion of unexhausted claims #6 Partial Opposition to Motion for Stay filed by Respondent Mona D. Huston. (LaPietra, Vincent) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE of California Attorney General Office Vincent P. LaPietra on behalf of Respondent Mona D. Huston. (Attorney Vincent P LaPietra added to party Mona D. Huston(pty:res))(LaPietra, Vincent) |
| Filing 7 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) Petitioner's Request for a Stay #6 by Magistrate Judge Patricia Donahue. Respondent is ordered to file either an opposition to Petitioner's motion for a stay or a notice of non-opposition no later than November 16, 2020. (see document for further details) (hr) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Stay Case pending exhaustion of unexhausted claims filed by petitioner Michael Lamar Vanderwood. (Attachments: #1 Declaration proof of service) (Schraer, George) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Miscellaneous Document #3 . The following error(s) was found: Other error(s) with document(s): Incorrect event selected. Correct event to be used is Consent to Proceed before US Magistrate-DECLINED by Party. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (ghap) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF REFERENCE to a U.S. Magistrate Judge. This case has been assigned to the calendar of the Honorable District Judge Percy Anderson and referred to Magistrate Judge Patricia Donahue, who is authorized to consider preliminary matters and conduct all further hearings as may be appropriate or necessary. Pursuant to Local Rule 83-2.4, the Court must be notified within five (5) days of any address change. See notice for additional details. (ghap) |
| Filing 3 Election re Non-Consent to Magistrate re: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, #1 (Schraer, George) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Movant Michael Lamar Vanderwood. (Schraer, George) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in State Custody (28 USC 2254), Receipt No. ACACDC-28383862 for $5 filing fee, filed by petitioner Michael Lamar Vanderwood. (Attachments: #1 Declaration proof of service) (Attorney George L Schraer added to party Michael Lamar Vanderwood(pty:bkmov))(Schraer, George) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
