Lindsay Lambert v. CalPortland Company et al
| Lindsay Lambert |
| CalPortland Company, DOES 1-100, and Does 1-100 |
| 5:2020cv02065 |
| October 5, 2020 |
| U.S. District Court for the Central District of California |
| Jesus G Bernal |
| Sheri Pym |
| Consumer Credit |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Fair Credit Reporting Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 15, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 22 Receipt of remand letter from San Bernardino Superior Court (twdb) |
| Filing 21 TRANSMITTAL of documents to Superior Court, San Bernardino County. A certified copy of the order of remand and a copy of the docket sheet from this court was sent to Superior Court, San Bernardino County. (twdb) |
Filing 20
ORDER (1) GRANTING Plaintiffs Motion for Remand (Dkt. No. #14 ); (2) DENYING AS MOOT Defendants Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. No. #11 ); and (3) VACATING the November 23, 2020 Hearing by Judge Jesus G. Bernal: Case Remanded to Superior Court of California, County of San Bernardino CIVDS 2016789. SEE DOCUMENT FOR FURTHER INFORMATION. MD JS-6. Case Terminated. (twdb)
|
| Filing 19 REPLY Support NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to San Bernardino Superior Court #14 filed by Plaintiff Lindsay Lambert. (Malk, Michael) |
| Filing 18 REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE re NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to San Bernardino Superior Court #14 Request for Judicial Notice in Support of Defendant's Opposition Memorandum to Plaintiff's Motion to Remand filed by Defendant CalPortland Company. (Peracchio, Paloma) |
| Filing 17 MEMORANDUM in Opposition to NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to San Bernardino Superior Court #14 filed by Defendant CalPortland Company. (Peracchio, Paloma) |
| Filing 16 SCHEDULING NOTICE by Judge Jesus G. Bernal: The MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Class Action Complaint (Partial) #11 is continued from 11/9/2020 to 11/23/2020 at 09:00 AM before Judge Jesus G. Bernal. IT IS SO ORDERED. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (mga) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
| Filing 15 REPLY in support of NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Class Action Complaint (Partial) #11 filed by Defendant CalPortland Company. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Paloma P. Peracchio)(Peracchio, Paloma) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to San Bernardino Superior Court filed by Plaintiff Lindsay Lambert. Motion set for hearing on 11/23/2020 at 09:00 AM before Judge Jesus G. Bernal. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Malk, Michael) |
| Filing 13 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Chaim Shaun Setareh counsel for Plaintiff Lindsay Lambert. Adding Thomas Segal as counsel of record for Plaintiff for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Plaintiff Lindsay Lambert. (Setareh, Chaim) |
| Filing 12 to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Opposition to re: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Class Action Complaint (Partial) #11 filed by Plaintiff Lindsay Lambert. (Attachments: #1 Declaration)(Malk, Michael) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Class Action Complaint (Partial) filed by Defendant CalPortland Company. Motion set for hearing on 11/9/2020 at 09:00 AM before Judge Jesus G. Bernal. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Paloma P. Peracchio, #2 Proposed Order) (Peracchio, Paloma) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE OF STANDING ORDER filed by Defendant CalPortland Company. (Peracchio, Paloma) |
|
Filing 9
STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Jesus G. Bernal. (ima)
|
| Filing 8 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by Defendant CalPortland Company, of Notice to Adverse Party and Clerk of the California Superior Court of Removal of Civil Action to United States District Court served on October 7, 2020. (Peracchio, Paloma) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Jesus G. Bernal and Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym. (et) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF CLASS OF ACTION COMPLAINT against Defendants CalPortland Company, Does 1-100. Jury Demanded., filed by Plaintiff Lindsay Lambert. [FILED IN STATE COURT ON 8/13/2020 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO EXHIBIT D AS ATTACHMENT NO. 4 TO DECLARATION of PALOMA P. PERACCHIO AS ATTACHMENT #3 . (et) |
| Filing 5 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by Defendant CalPortland Company, re Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #4 , Declaration, #3 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 , Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 served on October 5, 2020. (Peracchio, Paloma) |
| Filing 4 Certification of Interested Parties and Disclosure Statement CERTIFICATION of Interested Parties filed by Defendant CalPortland Company, identifying Lindsay Lambert; CalPortland Company. (Peracchio, Paloma) |
| Filing 3 DECLARATION of PALOMA P. PERACCHIO re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendant CalPortland Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Service of Process Receipt, #2 Exhibit B - State Court Summons, #3 Exhibit C - State Court Civil Case Cover Sheet, #4 Exhibit D - State Court Class Action Complaint, #5 Exhibit E - State Court Initial Case Management Conference Order)(Peracchio, Paloma) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant CalPortland Company. (Peracchio, Paloma) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from San Bernardino County Superior Court, case number CIVDS2016789 Receipt No: ACACDC-28384704 - Fee: $400, filed by Defendant CalPortland Company. (Attorney Paloma P Peracchio added to party CalPortland Company(pty:dft))(Peracchio, Paloma) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
