Kai Eastburn v. CVS Pharmacy Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Kai Eastburn
Defendant: CVS Pharmacy Inc. and Does 1 - 100 inclusive
Case Number: 5:2020cv02108
Filed: October 8, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 9, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 9, 2020 Filing 5 NOTICE RE INTRA-DISTRICT TRANSFER by Clerk of Court due to clerical error. Case is transferred to the Southern Division. Case has been reassigned to Judge David O. Carter for all further proceedings. New Case Number 8:20-cv-01961 DOC (JDEx). (esa)
October 8, 2020 COPY OF SERVICE OF PROCESS TRANSMITTAL executed by Plaintiff Kai Eastburn, upon Defendant CVS Pharmacy Inc. served on 9/8/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon CT Corporation, Agent for Service of Process by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity.Original Summons NOT returned. (non-conformed, submitted as document 1, p. 10) (esa)
October 8, 2020 COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint filed by defendant CVS Pharmacy Inc. (non-conformed, submitted as document 1, p. 52)(esa)
October 8, 2020 CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT against defendants CVS Pharmacy Inc., Does, Jury Demanded, filed by plaintiff Kai Eastburn. (filed in state court 6/16/20, submitted as document 1, p.13) (esa)
October 8, 2020 Filing 4 DECLARATION of Andrew K. Haeffele re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendant CVS Pharmacy Inc.. (Livingston, Leilani)
October 8, 2020 Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant CVS Pharmacy Inc., identifying CVS Health Corporation; CVS Pharmacy, Inc.; Garfield Beach CVS, LLC. (Livingston, Leilani)
October 8, 2020 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant CVS Pharmacy Inc.. (Livingston, Leilani)
October 8, 2020 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Orange County Superior Court, case number 30-20-01148504-CU-WT-CJC Receipt No: ACACDC-28449271 - Fee: $400, filed by Defendant CVS Pharmacy Inc.. (Attorney Leilani Elizabeth Livingston added to party CVS Pharmacy Inc.(pty:dft))(Livingston, Leilani)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Kai Eastburn v. CVS Pharmacy Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kai Eastburn
Represented By: Samantha S Bigonger
Represented By: Darius Gleason
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CVS Pharmacy Inc.
Represented By: Leilani Elizabeth Livingston
Represented By: Andrew Keith Haeffele
Represented By: Leilani Elizabeth Jones
Represented By: Daniel F Fears
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1 - 100 inclusive
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?