Paola E. Pina Palmerin v. Costco Wholesale Corporation, et al
Paola E. Pina Palmerin |
Costco Wholesale Corporation and Does 1-100, inclusive |
5:2020cv02134 |
October 9, 2020 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Jesus G Bernal |
Shashi H Kewalramani |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 3, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 The Court hereby vacates the Scheduling Conference set for 2/1/2021. The Court will issue a separate trial scheduling order setting forth a trial schedule. IT IS SO ORDERED. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (npo) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
Filing 10 REPORT PER ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE REPORT of RULE 26(F) JOINT REPORT filed by Defendant Costco Wholesale Corporation. (Blackwell, Kristi) |
|
Filing 8 ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery) Pursuant to Notice of Adoption of Costco Answer filed in Superior Court (Document 7 Filed 10/27/20) filed by Defendant Costco Wholesale Corporation.(Blackwell, Kristi) |
Filing 7 NOTICE Notice of Adoption of Costco's Answer filed in Superior Court filed by Defendant Costco Wholesale Corporation. (Blackwell, Kristi) |
|
Filing 5 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening. The following error(s) was found: Other error(s) with document(s): Civil Cover Sheet, Notice of Interested Parties, and Demand for Jury Trial are attached to the Notice of Removal. Each of these documents should have been filed and entered separately under its correct event/relief. You do not need to respond to this notice unless the Court directs you to do so. (esa) |
Filing 4 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (esa) |
Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Jesus G. Bernal and Magistrate Judge Shashi H. Kewalramani. (esa) |
Filing 2 NOTICE RE INTRA-DISTRICT TRANSFER by Clerk of Court due to incorrect intra-district venue selected by the filer. Case is transferred to the Eastern Division. Case has been assigned to Judge Jesus G. Bernal for all further proceedings. Any matters that may be referred to a Magistrate Judge are assigned to Shashi H. Kewalramani. New Case Number 5:20-cv-02134 JGB (SHKx). (esa) |
CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT against defendants Costco Wholesale Corporation, Does, Jury Demanded, filed by plaintiff Paola E. Pina Palmerin. (filed in state court 6/9/20, submitted as document 1, attachment 1, p. 9) (esa) |
COPY OF SERVICE OF PROCESS TRANSMITTAL executed by Plaintiff Paola E. Pina Palmerin, upon Defendant Costco Wholesale Corporation served on 7/13/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon CT Corporation, Agent for Service of Process by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity. Original Summons NOT returned. (non-conformed, submitted as document 1, attachment 1, p. 2) (esa) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Superior Court San Bernardino County, case number CIVDS2010761 Receipt No: ACACDC-28476385 - Fee: $400, filed by Defendant Costco Wholesale Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit 1 to Notice of Removal, #2 Exhibit Exhibit 2 to Notice of Removal, #3 Exhibit Exhibit 3 to Notice of Removal, #4 Exhibit Exhibit 4 to Notice of Removal, #5 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #6 Declaration Notice of Interested Parties, #7 Demand for Jury Trial) (Attorney Kristi Blackwell added to party Costco Wholesale Corporation(pty:bkmov))(Blackwell, Kristi) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.